Group velocity of two superimposed sine waves

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of group velocity in the context of superimposed sine waves with differing amplitudes. Participants explore how the group velocity is affected when the amplitudes of the waves are not equal, comparing this scenario to cases where the amplitudes are the same. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and manipulations of wave equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the applicability of the concept of group velocity when adding two sine waves of different amplitudes, seeking clarity on how to proceed with the analysis.
  • Another participant suggests performing a Fourier analysis to address the variation in amplitudes, implying that this is a common scenario.
  • It is proposed that manipulating the wave equations with different amplitudes may yield results similar to the usual case, but uncertainty remains about the implications for group velocity.
  • One participant expresses a belief that the group velocity might still be represented by Δω/Δk, but questions whether this holds true given the differing amplitudes.
  • A participant presents a breakdown of the wave equation, suggesting that it can be viewed as a combination of a wave packet with a group velocity and a plane wave without a group velocity.
  • There is a discussion about whether the overall group velocity can be defined for the combined terms, with some participants suggesting that the envelope still travels at Δω/Δk, while others seek clarification on the expression for the envelope.
  • One participant notes that the total envelope moves at the same speed as that for the case with equal amplitudes, although ambiguity remains regarding the interpretation of the monochromatic wave's contribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of amplitude variation for group velocity, with no consensus reached on whether a clear definition of group velocity exists for the combined waveforms. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the envelope and its velocity.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the waveforms and the definitions of group velocity, particularly when amplitudes differ. The mathematical steps and interpretations of the envelope are not fully resolved.

bardeen
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I understand the concept of group velocity when applied to superimposed sine waves of the same amplitude, and even when applied to wave packets (in which case you get the well-known expression ∂ω/∂k).
My question is what happens when you add two sine waves of different amplitudes? So something like:
y(x,t) = A1Sin[k1x-ω1t]+A2Sin[k2x-ω2t]

I tried to work out whether the concept of group velocity even has a meaning here, and if so, what it would be.
If the amplitudes were the same, one can use trigonometric identities to express the wave as the product of an envelope and something else. Then, the envelope can be seen to travel at the velocity Δω/Δk. But, again, I don't know how to proceed if the amplitudes are not the same.

Any comments are very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Variation in the amplitudes is common; do a Fourier analysis of an arbitrary blob ...
 
bardeen said:
Hi all,
If the amplitudes were the same, one can use trigonometric identities to express the wave as the product of an envelope and something else. Then, the envelope can be seen to travel at the velocity Δω/Δk. But, again, I don't know how to proceed if the amplitudes are not the same.
Do the same manipulations with different amplitudes. What do you get that's different from the "usual" case?
 
olivermsun said:
Do the same manipulations with different amplitudes. What do you get that's different from the "usual" case?
You get two terms of the same form as in the usual case. So, you get something like: envelope1*(sine wave) + envelope2*(cosine wave)

Is the group velocity still delta omega/ delta k ?
That's what my instinct told me but I somehow feel it's not right...
 
Okay, maybe one way you can think of it is this:
y(x,t)
= A1Sin[k1x-ω1t]+A2Sin[k2x-ω2t]
= A1(Sin[k1x-ω1t]+Sin[k2x-ω2t]) +(A2-A1)Sin[k2x-ω2t],
i.e., the usual packet of two waves (with a group velocity, etc.), superposed with a plane wave (no group velocity).
 
olivermsun said:
Okay, maybe one way you can think of it is this:
y(x,t)
= A1Sin[k1x-ω1t]+A2Sin[k2x-ω2t]
= A1(Sin[k1x-ω1t]+Sin[k2x-ω2t]) +(A2-A1)Sin[k2x-ω2t],
i.e., the usual packet of two waves (with a group velocity, etc.), superposed with a plane wave (no group velocity).

But then, is there a group velocity to the whole thing? The first two terms you wrote have a group velocity Δω/Δk, and the last one is just a plane wave. But what is the group velocity of all three terms put together?
 
The envelope should still travel at the same Δω/Δk... It's just that the envelope no longer goes to zero, right?
 
Sorry I don't think I'm getting it. What would the expression for the envelope be?
 
If you look at the expression in post #5, you see the wave field is expressed as the sum of (a) two superposed sine waves of the same amplitude, for which you have a clear interpretation of the group velocity, and (b) a monochromatic wave, which does not have an unambiguous group velocity. You can calculate the envelope for (a), and (b) has a constant envelope. So my interpretation would be that the total envelope moves at the same speed as that for (a). (I believe you can decompose this wave such that it's the product of the carrier with a complex envelope, but I'm not sure this helps much with the interpretation).

If the problem arose in a physical context, you would likely know ∂ω/∂k and there would be not be this ambiguity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K