Lorentz Transformations in xy & xyz Directions | Pat

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Lorentz transformations in scenarios where inertial frames are moving in the xy or xyz directions, rather than solely along the x-axis. The standard Lorentz transformation equations are provided, specifically x' = γ(x - vt) and t' = γ(t - vx/c²), which apply when frames S and S' have a relative velocity in the x-direction. For transformations in a plane or three-dimensional space, more complex equations involving hyperbolic functions and matrix representations are necessary, as referenced in Byron L. Coulter's work and Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics".

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations and their standard equations
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions and their applications in physics
  • Basic knowledge of matrix multiplication and representation in physics
  • Concept of inertial frames and relative motion in special relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in multiple dimensions
  • Learn about hyperbolic functions and their role in relativistic physics
  • Explore matrix representations of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Read "Relativistic motion in a plane" by Byron L. Coulter for advanced insights
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in advanced topics related to Lorentz transformations and their applications in multi-dimensional motion.

patapat
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
So I'm looking at some Lorentz transformation equations and it says
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-vx/c^{2})
y'=y
z'=z

I'm assuming the values for y', y, z' and z only hold true when the inertial frames of S and S' are moving at a relative velocity in the x-direction. With this being said, what would the transformations be if the inertial frames were in an xy or xyz direction? Thanks in advance.

-Pat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lorentz transformation plane motion

patapat said:
So I'm looking at some Lorentz transformation equations and it says
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-vx/c^{2})
y'=y
z'=z

I'm assuming the values for y', y, z' and z only hold true when the inertial frames of S and S' are moving at a relative velocity in the x-direction. With this being said, what would the transformations be if the inertial frames were in an xy or xyz direction? Thanks in advance.

-Pat
As far as I know the situation is known as plane motion. Your question is answered in

Relativistic motion in a plane
Byron L. Coulter
Am. J. Phys. 48, 633 (1980) Full Text: [ PDF (486 kB) GZipped PS Order ]
I think it can be simplified.
 
patapat said:
So I'm looking at some Lorentz transformation equations and it says
x'=\gamma(x-vt)
t'=\gamma(t-vx/c^{2})
y'=y
z'=z

I'm assuming the values for y', y, z' and z only hold true when the inertial frames of S and S' are moving at a relative velocity in the x-direction. With this being said, what would the transformations be if the inertial frames were in an xy or xyz direction? Thanks in advance.

-Pat

If (\mathbf{r},t) are space-time coordinates of an event in the reference frame O, and the reference frame O' moves with velocity \mathbf{v} = c \vec{\theta} \theta^{-1} \tanh \theta with respect to O, then space-time coordinates (\mathbf{r}',t') of the same event in O' can be obtained by formulas

\mathbf{r}' = \mathbf{r} + \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta}(\mathbf{r} \cdot \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta}) (\cosh \theta - 1) - \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta} ct \sinh \theta

t' = t \cosh \theta - (\mathbf{r} \cdot \frac{\vec{\theta}}{\theta}) \frac{\sinh \theta}{c}

These formulas are derived by the same procedure as momentum-energy Lorentz transformations (see eq. (4.2) - (4.3) in http://www.arxiv.org/physics/0504062 )

Eugene.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
t'=\gamma(t-{\vec r}\cdot{\vec v}/c^2)
 
Last edited:
The previous reply is three equations, I couldn't get Latex to do line by line.
r_\parallel and r_\perp are parallel and perp to v.
 
And if you know matrix multiplication,
B = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma &amp; -\gamma \beta_1 &amp; -\gamma \beta_2 &amp; -\gamma \beta_3 \\<br /> -\gamma \beta_1 &amp; 1 + \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1^2}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_2}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_3}{\beta^2} \\<br /> -\gamma \beta_2 &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_2}{\beta^2} &amp; 1+\frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_2^2}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_2\beta_3}{\beta^2} \\<br /> -\gamma \beta_3 &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_1\beta_3}{\beta^2} &amp; \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_2\beta_3}{\beta^2} &amp; 1 + \frac{(\gamma - 1)\beta_3^2}{\beta^2}<br /> \end{pmatrix}
where \beta = (\beta_1, \beta_2, \beta_3) is a unit vector in the direction of the relative velocity, and
x&#039; = B x for x = (c t, x, y, z) and similar for the transformed system x&#039;.

Source: Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, chapter 11.7[/size]
 
I had a feeling there was no simple answer, thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K