Can the Work Done by an Inductor Exceed the Electrical Power Used to Make It?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the energy stored in an inductor and the electrical power used to energize it. The energy stored is calculated as 1/2 L I^2, where L is inductance and I is current, and is independent of the rate at which current is achieved. The timing of the magnetic field's activation influences the work done by the inductor, but the overall power cannot exceed R I^2 according to electromagnetic theory. The conversation also touches on the time constant of a motor, defined as inductance divided by resistance, suggesting that the product of the time constant and pulse frequency should not exceed 2. Ultimately, the participants emphasize that inductive devices should not be analyzed using Ohm's law due to their low resistance characteristics.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
Energy stored in an inductor is equal to:

\frac{1}{2}L\mathbf{I}^2

Where L is the inductance in henries and I is the current in amps.

The energy stored in the inductor doesn't depend on how fast the current is attained, just the fact that it has some inductance and some current.

However, how fast the current can be attained can very well depend on what is supplying the inductor with current. The timing of turning on and off of the inductor magnetic field affects how much work could done by it. So what if we take the energy of the inductor and multiply by the frequency of the pulses? This should not exceed overall electrical power R{I}^2 if current electromagnetic theory is correct.

Assuming power factor is 1 (or not assuming power factor is one), \frac{1}{2}Lf, where f is frequency of on/off periods the inductor handles (to influence a magnetic rotor), cannot be greater than the resistance R of the coil. Do I have this right?

For example it should be impossible that a coil of 1100 henries with 770 Ohms of resistance can switch its whole magnetic field (i.e. with the current throughout the whole length of the coil) on and off 1.4 times every second. Isn't this well understood in engineering literature (I hope it is)? So \frac{1}{2}Lf \le R?

The time constant of any motor is simply inductance divided by resistance. This would mean that the time constant of the circuit times the frequency of the pulses cannot be greater than 2. Right?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello?
 
1/2*Inductance*(change of current from zero)^2/(time to change current) = power of an inductor

1/2*(Inductance/Resistance)*voltage*(change of current from zero)/(time to change current) = power of an inductor

(1/2*(time constant of circuit)/(time to change current))*voltage*(change of current from zero) = power of an inductor

power of inductor / electric power sent to coil = 1/2*(time constant of circuit)/(time to change current)
 
Last edited:
It just looks to me like you are mixing unrelated concepts there: Inductive devices don't have a high resistance, it would defeat their purpose. So you don't use ohm's law on them.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top