Differential Form of Gauss's Law

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differential form of Gauss's Law, exploring its meaning, implications, and differences from the integral form. Participants engage with concepts such as divergence and the behavior of electric and magnetic fields, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects of electromagnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek clarification on what the differential form means and how it relates to the integral form, particularly in the context of divergence.
  • One participant explains that the differential form describes local behavior of a system, indicating whether a field is divergenceless and relating this to sources or sinks of the field.
  • Another participant notes that the differential forms of Maxwell's equations provide information about field behavior at a point, which integral forms do not capture, while asserting that both forms describe the same physical phenomena.
  • There is a suggestion that the divergence operator is a vector derivative that indicates how much a vector field diverges from a point, with examples related to electric and magnetic fields.
  • One participant asserts that the differential and integral forms are equivalent, emphasizing the role of the divergence theorem in understanding this relationship.
  • Some participants express differing opinions on the aesthetic and conceptual clarity of the differential versus integral forms, with one finding the integral forms easier to understand.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the clarity and utility of the differential and integral forms. While some acknowledge their equivalence, others prefer one form over the other for understanding, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on which form is superior for clarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the divergence theorem and the mathematical properties of divergence and curl without fully resolving the implications or assumptions behind these concepts.

Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3
Could someone try and explain with the differential form means? I've only taken p to calculus 2 so I'm not really sure what divergence in the sense of this equation means. Also what is the difference in the two. I mean the integral form looks at an electric field and charge over a region, so what does the differential form represent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feldoh said:
Could someone try and explain with the differential form means? I've only taken p to calculus 2 so I'm not really sure what divergence in the sense of this equation means. Also what is the difference in the two. I mean the integral form looks at an electric field and charge over a region, so what does the differential form represent?

Always in physics we use to write equation in differential form because they explain how it is the behavior of a system locally...
the div operator acting on a vector field suggest us if the field is divergenceless (solenoidal) or not. Physically this mean that it counts the source or sink of the field. the abjective soleinoidal come from the magnetic field B, in fact we know that divB=0!

To obtain the integral equation we just use the divergence theorem, and we obtain the relation with the flux of the field trough a surface...

i think you can find many things on wiki or somewhere else that explain things better than me.

regards
marco
 
The differential forms of Maxwell's equations, like Gauss's Law help tell us how a field behaves at a point, which the integral forms cannot tell us about. Other than this one difference, they describe the same physical phenomena. Whether you use one form or another depends on how useful that form is to the problem your working on.

The divergence is just a vector derivative:

\nabla\cdot\vec{v}= \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z} In fact, just as there are two ways to multiply vectors (dot and cross products), there are two ways to differentiate them. You can take a vector's divergence, or it's curl. Both are derivatives, but they tell you different things. The divergence tells you how much the vector field diverges from a point, i.e. the electric field from a positive point charge had a high divergence. (It always points away from the source of the field. In other words, it diverges from that point.) On the other hand, the magnetic field of an infinite current-carrying wire, which loops around the wire has zero divergence (the field lines are always the same distance from the wire), but they have a high curl (the field lines "curl" back on themselves.)
 
Last edited:
The differential form and the integral form are the same thing. Once you learn the divergence theorem it will be plain as daylight.

Edit: Of course the differential form is much more pretty, and describes what is happening as a point, as others already mentioned.
 
Last edited:
You find the differential form of Maxwell's equatons prettier? I find the integral forms easier to understand and more enlightening.
 
Defennnder said:
You find the differential form of Maxwell's equatons prettier? I find the integral forms easier to understand and more enlightening.

think of the differential form as exactly the same as the integral form, but with the milli-smidgen of volume of the little cube being arbitrarily small. it's the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K