Does that help?Cheers,Chris.Pendulum Clock Time Dilation

ehj
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I have read the derivation of time dilation by using a lightclock, but I can't seem to find an argument that shows why the result applies for anything else but light clocks. Is there perhaps another derivation that can show the same result but perhaps show that it applies for everything and not just light clocks? I would prefer if it didn't require complex numbers or any hyperbolic trigonometry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by a "light clock"?
There is a simple standard derivation of time dilation from the Lorentz transformation equation.
 
ehj said:
I have read the derivation of time dilation by using a lightclock, but I can't seem to find an argument that shows why the result applies for anything else but light clocks. Is there perhaps another derivation that can show the same result but perhaps show that it applies for everything and not just light clocks? I would prefer if it didn't require complex numbers or any hyperbolic trigonometry.

Consider a lightclock [that you have just analyzed] together with a typical wristwatch... (keeping in mind the principle of relativity)...
 
pendulum clock

ehj said:
I have read the derivation of time dilation by using a lightclock, but I can't seem to find an argument that shows why the result applies for anything else but light clocks. Is there perhaps another derivation that can show the same result but perhaps show that it applies for everything and not just light clocks? I would prefer if it didn't require complex numbers or any hyperbolic trigonometry.

Hi ehj!

Imagine a pendulum clock, facing South, so the pendulum swings East-West, one swing per second.

Imagine two mirrors that the pendulum just touches, with a ray of light bouncing to and fro, East-West, between the mirrors, N times per second.

Now move away from the clock at speed v, due South.

Then you regard the distance between the mirrors as the same (for the same reason that a train moving at high speed along a straight track will still regard the width of the track and the width of the train as equal).

But the mirrors are now moving away from you with speed v, and so you say the light ray has to travel further, along a zigzag track.

Consider one triangle of that zigzag.

You say that the light still goes at speed c, along the diagonal (hypotenuse) of that triangle. And the long side of the triangle must be v/c times the diagonal.

So (from Pythagoras!) the short side is \sqrt{1\,-\,v^2/c^2} times the diagonal.

So you say that the light travels (along the zigzag diagonals) \frac{N}{\sqrt{1\,-\,v^2/c^2}} times the distance between the mirrors to go to and fro N times.

Which means that you say that the light takes \frac{1}{\sqrt{1\,-\,v^2/c^2}} longer to do it.

Which means that 1 second on the pendulum clock is \frac{1}{\sqrt{1\,-\,v^2/c^2}} seconds for you! :smile:

(And we've used constancy of the speed of light, and nothing else.)
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top