What is the Difference Between a Lie Subalgebra and a Subspace?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KarateMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
KarateMan
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have a question about Lie subalgebra.

They say "a Lie subalgebra is a much more CONSTRAINED structure than a subspace".
Well, it seems subtle, and I find this very tricky to follow.

Can anyone explain this with concrete examples?

If my question is not clear, please tell me so, I will try to rephrase it.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
an algebra is nececearily not a space (understood vectorspace), so there is a big different. If you are talking about an subalgebra and a lie subalgebra. I guess you know the usual deffinition of a subalgebra, a lie subalgebra is a much more strict because a lie subalgebra needs to be a algebra + a submanifold, which is very strict.
 
KarateMan: A Lie subalgebra is a linear subspace which is a Lie algebra.
Hence, besides being a subspace, it has to satisfy the Lie algebra axioms (e.g. it has to be closed under the Lie bracket!).

mrandersdk: There are no topological requirements for Lie (sub)algebras.
 
mrandersdk said:
an algebra is nececearily not a space

This is terribly, terribly wrong.
 
so sorry always do this, i read it as lie group, why do i always do this. Sorry again.

Neglect my comment.
 
Thanks everyone. took me a while but I think I swallowed it!
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top