Potential Energy and energy conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of potential energy and work in physics, specifically the equations for gravitational and elastic work. The user is confused about the relationship between the new work equations and those from a previous chapter, particularly regarding a ball thrown vertically. Clarification reveals that the net work done by gravity is zero when the ball returns to its original height, but the work done during the fall can be calculated using both methods, yielding consistent results. Additionally, the user inquires whether internal energy is equivalent to work done by non-conservative forces, indicating a need for further understanding of energy conservation principles. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying work equations in different contexts.
kyin01
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, so I was going to start on my HW but there was some things confusing me when reading the book.
This is calculus based (feel free to use integrals) and we are on the concept of potential and total mechanical energy and such.1) This new chapter we are on introduces
Work_{grav}=mgh_{1} -mgh_{2} (1 being above 2) and

Work_{el}=.5kx_{1} ^{2} - .5kx_{2} ^{2}

However in the previous chapter we were told that W_{net}=\DeltaK_{energy} or W=F\bullet _{net} \vec{s}

So my question is, if the Work introduced now the same kind of work as we were told in the previous chapter?
I tried setting an quick example, let's assume we throw a ball of 10kg vertically upwards and it reaches a maximum height of 5m and than goes back down. Gravity is 10\frac{m}{s^{2}}. So let's pretend no air resistance and such and we are trying to find work.
If I use this equation W=F_{net}\bullet\vec{s}, I get work is = to 50J
but if I use the new equation Work_{grav}=mgh_{1} -mgh_{2}, work is = to 500

So what is it I am not understanding? Are they 2 different kind of work?2) Is internal energy (U_{int}) the same as work done by non conservative forces (W_{nc})?

edit: i have no idea why the subscripts appear as superscripts, I tried editing and fix but it still appears as superscripts. If it's not clear enough please let me know I'll make them into pictures in MSPaint and post or something
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kyin01 said:
So my question is, if the Work introduced now the same kind of work as we were told in the previous chapter?
Sure.
I tried setting an quick example, let's assume we throw a ball of 10kg vertically upwards and it reaches a maximum height of 5m and than goes back down. Gravity is 10\frac{m}{s^{2}}. So let's pretend no air resistance and such and we are trying to find work.
If the ball goes up and down, the net work done by gravity is zero. (The work is negative on the way up, positive on the way down.)

Let's say you want the work done by gravity when a ball falls from a height of 5m to the ground, which is what I think you were calculating.
If I use this equation W=F_{net}\bullet\vec{s}, I get work is = to 50J
How did you get this? The force = mg = 100N. If we call the distance h=5m, the work done = mgh = (100)*5 = 500 J.
but if I use the new equation Work_{grav}=mgh_{1} -mgh_{2}, work is = to 500
This also gives you mgh = 500 J.
 
Ahh, sorry I see it now. Thanks

So is Is internal energy the same as work done by non conservative forces?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top