Negative Rest Mass: Faster than Light?

Daedalus_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Theoretically, if an object were to have negative rest mass, would it travel faster than light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daedalus_ said:
Theoretically, if an object were to have negative rest mass, would it travel faster than light?

Which kind of mass are you talking about -- inertial mass, "active" gravitational mass, or the "passive" gravitational mass?

Generally, when considering negative masses, it is assumed that they fall with the same acceleration as as positive masses, and conservation of momentum is valid. They do not travel faster than light.

By putting '-m' in place of m in Newton's law of gravitation, you can play around a bit with the concept of negative mass. Note that negative masses move in the opposite direction of the applied force on it. Can you figure out what will happen when a mass m and a mass '-m' are just left close to one another?

To answer your question, objects with imaginary masses, which are called tachyons, travel faster than light.

EDIT: There is already a lot of discussion going on in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=66852, which I had somehow missed.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top