Are Hermite Polynomials Always Cubic When Used for Interpolation?

AI Thread Summary
Hermite interpolation polynomials are not necessarily cubic; they can take various forms depending on the constraints applied. The discussion highlights that a cubic polynomial can be constructed to satisfy specific conditions at two points, including function values and derivatives. This involves solving four equations for four unknowns, which is the foundation of cubic splines. While cubic polynomials can be used for interpolation, they are not the only option available. The conversation emphasizes the flexibility of Hermite polynomials beyond just cubic forms.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
are hermite interpolationg polynomials necessarily cubic even when used to interpolate between two points?

this page would have me believe so in calling it a "clamped cubic" :

http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/n2003/HermitePolyMod.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's more the case that there exists a cubic polynomial of the form:

a x3 + b x2 + c x + d, which satisfies the constraints at two points, (x0, y0) and (x1, y1), where

p(x0) = f(x0) = y0

p(x1) = f(x1) = y1

and

p'(x0) = f'(x0) = y'0

p'(x1) = f'(x1) = y'1

4 equations, and 4 unknowns (a, b, c, d)

This is the basis of the cubic spline.
 
i think given that argument for some groups of points with slopes the minimum curve that goes through both is a cubic.
 
anyone?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top