Solving a Work/Energy Physics Problem: Troubleshooting and Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a physics problem related to work and energy. The user is uncertain about their gravitational energy term, initially using "mgx" instead of the correct "mgh." Clarifications are made regarding the definitions of variables, specifically how to express height (h) in terms of distance (x). After recalculating, the user finds their value for x closely aligns with the book's answer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up equations for gravitational energy and frictional work.
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jason03,

The term you have for the gravitational energy is not correct. Do you see why?

(I think you might also want to recalculate the frictional work term.)
 
For gravitational energy do you mean the mgh on the right side of the equation?...I have mgx which could be a problem but I am not sure.



And for frictional work U 1-2 = -Friction*distance

so I did Kinetic Friction * Normal Force * distance x
 
Jason03 said:
For gravitational energy do you mean the mgh on the right side of the equation?...I have mgx which could be a problem but I am not sure.

What is the h in that equation, and what does the x you have represent? How can you write h in terms of x?
 
i just did h = x sin 25 and I came up with x = 2.3 and the book has x = 2.28

so now i have to figure the velocity and total frictional work
 
got it all figured out...thanks for the help!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top