What is the electron configuration of Ni2+?

  • Thread starter Thread starter risky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The electron configuration of Ni2+ is [Ar] 3d8, as it has 26 electrons after losing two from its neutral state. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the Aufbau principle and Madelung rule in determining electron filling order, where lower principal quantum numbers are filled first. Options d and e are eliminated since they suggest configurations with more than 8 electrons in the 3d subshell. The conversation highlights the significance of understanding these principles for accurate electron configuration. Overall, the correct configuration reflects the fundamental rules of electron arrangement in atomic orbitals.
risky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What is the electron configuration of Ni2+?
a. [Ar] 3d6 4s2
b. [Ar] 3d7 4s1
c. [Ar] 3d8
d. [Ar] 3d8 4s2
e. [Ar] 3d8 4s1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, Nickle is in the period after Argon, that's why you don't have to state the configuration of argon and you can give the symbol: [Ar] This just signifies the octet configuration (8 electrons in valence shell). Then, as you notice, Ni2+ has a number of 28-2= 26.
Ar has an atomic number of 18.
26-18=8.
So you have 8 electrons left. so you can cancel out options d and e.

The d subshell has 5 orbitals. The principal quantum number of the d subshell is 3 in this case. 3 is lower than 4, thus, theoretically, you will fill in the lower quantum number first. There are special cases which do not exhibit this though.

And that's why you'll fill in these 8 electrons into the orbitals in 3d. Making it:

[Ar]3d8

Hope it helps. You can ask me again if you don't get this.
 
Please check Aufbau principle and Madelung rule. 3d is filled before 4p and 5s. Just looking at the principal quantum number is not enough.

Madelung rule states that orbitals are filled in the order given by sum n+l, if for two orbitals n+l is identical the one with lower n is filled first.

There are exceptions though.
 
Yeah sorry for missing that. >< needa go review my chem again.

Thanks
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top