Radius of Planet with Double Gravity: Calculating with F=ma

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lance WIlliam
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of a planet with double the gravity of Earth while having the same mass. Participants clarify that the gravitational acceleration (g) does not simply double; instead, it is derived from the relationship between weight and radius. The correct approach involves using gravitational equations to relate the weights on both planets and simplifying to find the radius ratio. The final conclusion indicates that the radius of the new planet is approximately 0.707 times that of Earth's radius, not double. This highlights the importance of careful mathematical manipulation in gravitational calculations.
Lance WIlliam
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
If the question reads:
Space explorers land on a planet that has the same mass as Earth, but they find they weigh twice as much as they would on Earth
What is the radius of the planet?


Do I assume the 'g" = 9.8(2) ?
Since they weight twice as much...does that mean the gravity is doubled?

Im going to use the eqn. F(ma)=GMm/r^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can.
 
Can anyone please check the math?
I get 4.50e6 which sounds right meters...
But masteringphysics is telling me I am wrong
I did:

(6.67e-11)(5.98e24)/19.62=r^2

19.62 came from 9.8(2) since they wieght twice as much...
Thankyou for your help.
 
Seems ok to me.
 
Hi Lance! :smile:
Lance WIlliam said:
Do I assume the 'g" = 9.8(2) ?

No … you needn't assume anything about g …

this will work for any two planets of the same mass where the weight differs by a factor of 2.
Im going to use the eqn. F(ma)=GMm/r^2

ok … but you'll have to write it twice, won't you, with an r1 and an r2? :smile:
 
Lance:
It just gets messy with writing digits!
Instead, use better symbols like this:
m_{e},r_{e},w_{e}, m
which means mass of earth, radius of Earth, weight on Earth and mass of explorer, respectively..
These quantities are related by the following equation:
w_{e}=\frac{Gm_{e}m}{r_{e}^{2}}(*)
On new planet "p", we also have the equation:
w_{p}=\frac{Gm_{p}m}{r_{p}^{2}}(**)
You are given the following information:
m_{p}=m_{e},w_{p}=2w_{e}
Inserting these into (**), we get:
2w_{e}=\frac{Gm_{e}m}}{r_{p}^{2}}(***)
Now, perform the division (***)/(*), and we get:
\frac{2w_{e}}{w_{e}}=\frac{\frac{Gm_{e}m}{r_{p}^{2}}}{\frac{Gm_{e}m}{r_{e}^{2}}}
which simplifies to:
2=(\frac{r_{e}}{r_{p}})^{2}
Now, you can solve this equation for the planet radius in terms of the Earth radius, only THEN introduce digits!
 
I get 4.51e6 which is still wrong...I hate online homeowrk...:(
 
Lance WIlliam said:
I get 4.51e6 which is still wrong...I hate online homeowrk...:(

I think that answer is correct, if the units are supposed to be meters. Are you supposed to use a different unit?
 
the units they want just say R_p_=(answer) R_e_
 
  • #10
Ahh right that explains it. What do you multiply the Earth's radius by to get the planets radius?
 
  • #11
So my (answer) times 2?
 
  • #12
No, the radius of the planet is definitely not twice the Earth's radius. You can work it out since you have both quantities. Just rearrange the equation in post # 9 or follow arildno's post for hints.
 
  • #13
.707(R_e_) Got it.
Thankyou!
 
Back
Top