Ionizing particles (alpha & beta)

pfalk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I think I understand the impact that an alpha particle can have on living tissue.
Not having electrons in it valence it would be very reactive - stripping electrons from atoms or molecules it bumps into (assuming it made its way in a biotic host).

But how does a beta particle ionize an atom or molecule? If the target atom/molecule had a full valence wouldn't the beta particle just get deflected? And, if it were to join a full valence wouldn't it just knock another electron out, leaving the initial target atom/molecule unchanged?

Regarding gamma rays, how exactly do they interact with an atom/molecule? How does a photon ionize an atom/molecule?

Thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really know, but I would guess that a \beta^- particle (which is just an electron) can come with a lot of kinetic energy, so it would probably collide with another electron and transfer enough energy to that electron to escape the atom/molecule that it is bound to. If it doesn't have enough energy for that it would probably be absorbed by some molecule that is moderately stable, ionizing it. \beta^+ particles are positrons, and annihiliate with electrons releasing at least 2mc^2 = 1.022 MeV in energy in, probably gamma rays (which may go on to ionizing other stuff, as well as already having ionized something by annihilating an electron).

Gamma rays are very high energy (> 100 keV), if a gamma ray was absorbed by an electron it would certainly have enough energy to escape whatever bound state it was in, and would probably end up colliding with several other electrons and ionizing nearby molecules before it runs out of energy.
 
Energy and momentum (4-momenta) is transferred between charged particles due to the Coulomb interaction, which has infinite range. So we should not think of this as biliard balls colliding, but instead an incoming wave function interacting with the coulomb potentials that is generated by the atomic electrons and the atomic nucleus.

And if you know you scattering theory, you can calculate the probability for transfering an amount of energy that can excite and ionize and atom. And then calculate the accumulated effect, this is done in the Bethe-Bloch formula.

For charged particles also undergo radiative losses, due to the change in momentum vector (i.e acceleration), and this process leads to bremsstrahlung, since accelerated charge emits EM-waves (i.e. photons). This process is dominating over the ionization energy losses when we have light particles, i.e electrons.

Photons interact with matter with 3 processes; pair-production - compton scattering & Photoelectric effect. In the latter, the photon can be absorbed by the atomic electron and if the energy of the photon is higher than then ionization energy, the electron will leave the atom - i.e the atom becomes ionized.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top