Lim n[tex]\rightarrow[/tex][tex]\infty[/tex] (1+(x/n))[tex]^{n}[/tex]

  • Thread starter Thread starter torasstripes
  • Start date Start date
torasstripes
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
lim n\rightarrow\infty (1+(x/n))^{n}

I have no idea where to start. Can anyone who knows what to do give me a hint or tell me the first step? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks an awful lot like an exponential function to me. Take the logarithm of (1+(x/n))^n and you have a limit, as n goes to infinity, of the form 0*\infty. That can be rewritten as so that it is of the form "0/0" and, even though here n is an integer, you can use L'Hopital's rule.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
That looks an awful lot like an exponential function to me. Take the logarithm of 1+(x/n))^n and you have a limit, as n goes to infinity, of the form 0*\infty. That can be rewritten as so that it is of the form "0/0" and, even though here n is an integer, you can use L'Hopital's rule.
<br /> <br /> I&#039;m pretty sure I can&#039;t pull the one out of the parenthesis like that. Like when you foil you always have a middle term? So with this we should have n+1 terms, but if we take the one out it chages the equation and we only have two terms if we expand it
 
Maybe I'm wrong. If I can't come up with something better I will do that
 
The 1 was supposed to be in the parentheses! I have edited my previous post.

The logarithm of (1+ (x/n))^n is n log(1+ (x/n)) which, as I said, is of the form "0*\infty". You can write that as log(1+ (x/n))/(1/n) so that it is now of the form "0/0". Apply L'Hopital's rule treating the n as a continuous variable.
 
alright. thanks so much!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top