Writing chemical equations w/ catalysts

  • Thread starter Thread starter ob94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on writing chemical equations involving catalysts, specifically the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) catalyzed by potassium iodide (KI). The proposed equation, 2(H2O2) [yield w/ KI above the sign] 2(H2O) + O2, is confirmed to be correct, with a suggestion to use the term "decomposition" for clarity. Participants recommend using educational websites for further information, emphasizing searches limited to .edu domains for reliable resources. The user expresses gratitude for the guidance and successfully finds a helpful website. Understanding the decomposition aspect of the reaction is highlighted as beneficial for completing the lab report.
ob94
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi. for a science lab in school we were discussing/exploring chemical equations...
we had hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) which was catalyzed by potassium iodide (KI)
for our lab report we need links to a website which describes how to properly write equations w/ catalysts. so firstly is this right:

2(H2O2) [yield w/ KI above the sign] 2(H2O) + O2

as a note, if i put 2 then parentheses it means that 2 is the coefficient.
secondly, could anybody provide me with helpful links or an explination to why the above equations is right (or wrong if it is) and why? i'd like an explination and a few links so i could finish my project and do well on it.

i'd appreciate an answer ASAP. thanks <3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
another thing, what would that problem look like in words?

something like this id imagine (but not positive):

hydrogen peroxide (L) catalyzed by a potassium iodide crystal
 
You are more or less OK, you may want to use word "decomposition". As for finding links - google seems to be the best idea. You may want to limit your searches to .edu sites, try something like "hydrogen peroxide decomposition site:edu"
 
okay, thank you very, very much.
this really helped, i found a perfect website! :]

(and the fact that it was a decomp equation really helped me too.)
thanks again.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top