Prove Spinor Identity in Arbitrary Dimension

  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Spinor
ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Actually, the original motivation is to check the closure of SUSY
\delta X^\mu = \bar{\epsilon}\psi^\mu
\delta \psi^\mu = -i\rho^\alpha\partial_\alpha X^\mu\epsilon
where \rho^\alpha is a two dimensional gamma matrix, and \psi^\mu ia s two dimensional Majorana spinor, the index \mu in the two dimensional world is just some label of different fields.
I try to prove
[\delta_1,\delta_2]\psi^\mu = 2i\bar{\epsilon}_1\rho^\alpha\epsilon_2\ \partial_\alpha\psi^\mu
The following identity will help me a lot to prove the above formula,
\chi_A(\xi\eta) = - \xi_A(\eta\chi) - \eta_A(\chi\xi)\cdots(*)
where A is the spinor index and \chi,\xi,\eta are three spinors.
My question is, I don't know how to prove (*), and I don't know those spinors in (*) are Majorana spinors or not, moreover, I even don't know those spinors live in what dimension!
Does anyone know how to prove (*)? or anyone know the reference which treat the algebra of spinors in arbitrary dimension? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A:I think I have figured out the proof of (*). It is well known that, for two spinors \chi,\eta, the following holds\xi_A(\eta\chi) = \xi^B(\eta_A\chi_B + \eta_B\chi_A)\cdots(1)So, we can calculate the left side of (*) as\xi_A(\eta\chi) = - \xi^B(\eta_A\chi_B + \eta_B\chi_A)+ \eta_A(\chi^B\xi_B + \chi_B\xi^B)=- \xi^B(\eta_A\chi_B + \eta_B\chi_A)- \eta_A(\chi_B\xi^B)= - \xi_A(\eta\chi) - \eta_A(\chi\xi)which is exactly the right side of (*).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top