Burning Candle/Oxygen Lab: Questions & Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter yjk91
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The lab experiment with burning candles in water aims to demonstrate the relationship between oxygen consumption and water displacement. Experimental results showed varying percentages of oxygen, leading to the conclusion that the experiment does not accurately prove the Earth's air composition of 20% oxygen. Inside the graduated cylinder, as oxygen is burned, water rises to fill the void, but carbon dioxide dissolves in water, complicating the results. A significant source of error is the trapping of hot air within the cylinder, which affects water level readings. Suggestions for improving accuracy include using a larger jar and potentially adding NaOH to the water to observe different outcomes.
yjk91
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In class we did a lab with burning candles and water. In this way
1. Find a large beaker that can contain certain amount of water, graduated cylinders, and a candle.
2. After measuring each equipments, try to make the candle stand straight in the water filled beaker.
3. Light the candle and put the graduated cylinder on top of the candle. * The top of the beaker must be under water so oxygen cannot come in.
4. After the light goes out, record your observation.
Basically what it does is the the candle burns oxygen enabling water to rise.

So it is said that the Earth's air is made up of 20% oxygen.
Question 1: will this experiment prove this theory?
Question 2: what is going on inside the graduated cylinder?


The Attempt at a Solution


22.1519% 25.6929% 19.6203%
After 3 trials these percentage are the experimental values. 22,26,20.
SO i think the answer to Q1 is false because the numbers were different. but i can't back it up with valid evidence
Q2. I think it has to do with the pressure and volume. Since oxygen is burned up the water will rise to fill the empty space, but what about CO2? won't it fill the empty space of O2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difference in the 3 experimental results were due to experimental error. I would say
the theoretical value agreed pretty well with experimental data.

CO2 readily dissolves in water (to form carbonic acid) so it won't occupy space.

A major source of error of such experiment setup is that when the cylinder is put above the lit candle, it traps hot air. When the candle is out, the air gradually cools down and contracts, causing an extra rise in water level. Such an error depends on many factors, like how quickly the cylinder is lowered, air draft, how soon the water level is measured, etc.
 
http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/00000198

I have tried to repeat the experiment several times. From what I have seen if you use large jar and you don't allow hot air to escape, water doesn't rise substantially. So if you ask me, carbon dioxide doesn't dissolve in tap water fast enough. Could be you can try to add some NaOH to water to see the effect. Have to try it one day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top