Calculating Orbital Velocity for a Satellite Orbiting Earth

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the orbital velocity for a satellite in Low Earth Orbit at 346.9 km, the formula v = √(Gm_E/r_E) is used, resulting in a velocity of approximately 7,700.27 m/s. However, this value is considered too precise due to the significant figures of the constants used, and it is suggested to express it as 7.7 km/s. The discussion also highlights that orbits are not perfectly circular, especially in low-Earth orbit. Additionally, there is curiosity about the time it takes for rockets, like the Space Shuttle, to reach this velocity, typically around 8 to 10 minutes. Overall, while the calculation is fundamentally correct, precision and orbital characteristics are important considerations.
.:Endeavour:.
Messages
80
Reaction score
1
Can you find the orbital velocity of a planet which a satellite has to obtain in order to revolve around the planet with this formula:

v = \sqrt{\frac{Gm_E}{r_E}}

G = gravitational constant 6.67*10-11
mE = Mass of a planet
rE = the radius of the orbit

rE = h + r
h = height of the orbit
r = the radius of a plant from the center of the planet to its surface

Lets see, if you want to find the orbital velocity that a satellite has to get in order to orbit the Earth in Low Earth Orbit (346.9 km).

mE = 5.98*1024 kg
rE = h + r
h = 346,900 meters (346.9 km)
r = 6.38*106 meters

v = \sqrt{\frac{(6.67*10^-^1^1)(5.98*10^2^4 kg))}{6,726,900}}
v = 7,700.27 m/s

In order to obtain an orbit at an altitude of 346.9 km you will need to get a velocity of 7,700.27 m/s. Is this right, if not please correct me. Thank you for your time.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
.:Endeavour:. said:
In order to obtain an orbit at an altitude of 346.9 km you will need to get a velocity of 7,700.27 m/s. Is this right, if not please correct me. Thank you for your time.

That is basically correct. To pick a nit: This result, 7,700.27 m/s, has too much precision. You used a three-figure value for both G and for the radius of the Earth. Your result has thusly at most three significant figures, so saying something down to centimeter per seconds is incorrect. This result also ignores that orbits do not have to be circular, or that there is no such thing as a perfectly circular orbit, particularly in low-Earth orbit.

If you had said 7.7 kilometers per second instead of 7,700.27 m/s I wouldn't have picked so many nits.
 
D H said:
That is basically correct. To pick a nit: This result, 7,700.27 m/s, has too much precision. You used a three-figure value for both G and for the radius of the Earth. Your result has thusly at most three significant figures, so saying something down to centimeter per seconds is incorrect. This result also ignores that orbits do not have to be circular, or that there is no such thing as a perfectly circular orbit, particularly in low-Earth orbit.

If you had said 7.7 kilometers per second instead of 7,700.27 m/s I wouldn't have picked so many nits.

The velocity is an approximate, but like you said it isn't exact. I agree that the 7,700.27 m/s does look too precise. I was using my book to refer on what the units to use for the velocity
which gave m/s.

For a rocket to reach 7.7 km does it have to reach that velocity in a period of time or not? Because most rockets like the Space Shuttle reach LEO orbit around 8 to 10 minutes. Just kind of curious there.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top