Centrifugal Force - Is It Real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldskool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifugal
AI Thread Summary
Centrifugal force is often misunderstood as a real force, but it is actually a perceived effect of inertia when an object moves in a circular path. The true force at play is centripetal force, which acts towards the center of the circular motion. This force can be calculated using Newton's laws, specifically the formula F = [m(v^2)]/r. When an object, like a ball on a string, is spun, it tends to move straight due to inertia, and if the string is cut, it will follow a tangential path rather than flying outward. Understanding this distinction clarifies why centrifugal force is not considered a real force in physics.
oldskool
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
centrifugal or what??

Hello all!

i have been reading different books thoughout the years and some people talk generally about centrifugal force being not a real force.

Know would someone please explain if why this is the case.

Also how do you find the force on a wall of a spinning object say a closed square full of a cubic metre of water. Because i have read that there are different forces applying on a surface other than centrifugal.

If somon could give me an example of this and it would be great because i don't understand this matter.

Ps take your time - I've got heaps and in no rush.

Thanks guys
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Centrifugal force does not actually exist. Centrifugal force is a force coming out from a center point. The real force is centripetal force which means a a center seeking force. The object travels in circular motion or an orbit because of a force pulling upon it radially to a point in the center. Here is a supporting link. http://www.Newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00305.htm

Centripetal force can be calculated by Newtons universal law of gravitation.

F = [m(v^2)]\r

F = force
m = mass of object
v = velocity (which is sqaured in this case)
r = radius

Force is equal to mass times velocity sqaured all over the radius.

Examples for this could be a ball on a string being spun in a circle, the moon orbiting the Earth or a vehicle traveling around around a circular freeway curve.

Hope this was of some help.
 


blimkie.k said:
Centrifugal force does not actually exist. Centrifugal force is a force coming out from a center point. The real force is centripetal force which means a a center seeking force. The object travels in circular motion or an orbit because of a force pulling upon it radially to a point in the center. Here is a supporting link. http://www.Newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00305.htm

Centripetal force can be calculated by Newtons universal law of gravitation.

F = [m(v^2)]\r

I'm not really sure I agree with that explanation. Also, that's not Newtons Law of Gravitation, its just his second law. AKA F=dp/dt in a different form. This is Newtons law of gravitation;

b65000f8f887a68545ce63eb1cada232.png



It's true that centrifugal forces don't technically exist, its just that from a simple perspective it seems like they do. Centrifugal forces are simply created by the inertia of an object wanting to keep going forward. For example, spinning a ball on the end of a string. Your are giving the ball a forward velocity component, but because of the string you are causing an constant acceleration to make the ball move in a circular path. And as Newton's second law says, any mass that undergoes an acceleration or a change in momentum must have a force acting upon it. So this reactive force that you are feeling from the ball wanting to keep going forward is what we call the centrifugal force. It's not actually pulling the ball outward, its just the ball wanting to keep going strait. Perhaps someone can explain it better, I always just seem to confuse people.
 


Topher925 said:
It's not actually pulling the ball outward, its just the ball wanting to keep going strait.
This is correct. If you suddenly cut the string, the ball will not going flying outwards, it will actually continue along its present course which is tangential to the circular path. This demonstrates that there was no centrifugal force pushing the ball outward, it was just the inertia of the ball. (line AB in the diagram)

fig5-4.jpg
 


Yea, i tried to keep it simple, its a hard concept to explain without the use of demonstrations and diagrams, Dave managed to find a pretty nice one however.
 


blimkie.k said:
Centrifugal force is a force coming out from a center point.

So yea i take back that statement. Its not worded correctly as the diagram demonstrates.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top