Two pm alternators in parallel query

  • Thread starter Thread starter b.shahvir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
AI Thread Summary
Two permanent magnet alternators connected in parallel are discussed, focusing on the effects of increasing the driving torque of one alternator. Increasing the torque of alternator A raises its induced emf, while the induced emf of alternator B may not change significantly due to load sharing. The terminal voltage may remain constant or decrease due to armature reaction, despite the increase in torque. The conversation highlights the complexities of current distribution and phase relationships when the alternators operate out of phase, which can lead to increased current draw and potential system instability. Practical phasor diagrams are requested to better understand these dynamics, as existing textbook diagrams may not accurately reflect real-world conditions.
b.shahvir
Messages
284
Reaction score
25
Hi Guys, :smile:

My query is a bit abstract in nature! But i will be very grateful if someone can provide me with the solution to my query. Here goes;

Consider two Permanent Magnet (PM) Alternators Alt 'A' & Alt 'B' connected in parallel, supplying equal power to a purely 'Resistive' load (unity p.f.). Both the Alternators have equal stator synchronous reactances (stator resistances can be neglected). Please note, they are not connected to the local power grid (infinite bus). Now, if i increase the driving torque of say, Alt 'A', then what changes will occur with respect to the following electrial parameters:-

1) Will magnitude of induced emf 'Ea' of Alt 'A' increase/decrease ? Please explain.

2) Will magnitude of induced emf 'Eb' of Alt 'B' increase/decrease ? Please explain

3) Will magnitude of terminal voltage 'Vt' increase/decrease ? If the magnitude of 'Vt' remains constant or decreases (due to armature reaction), then please explain.

4) Can someone please provide me with a practical phasor diagram for the above query. I am asking for one, since the phasor diagrams in textbooks have lot of assumed conditions & hence do not relate to practical conditions!

Any kind of help will be highly appreciated.


Thanks & Regards,
Shahvir
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I simulated your problem with LTSpice. I had two 100-volt 60-Hz in-phase voltage generators in parallel, each with a 1 ohm series resistance. The two outputs were combined in parallel, and the summed current fed to a 10-ohm load resistor. Each voltage source put out about 4.5 amps, and the current in the load resistor was 9 amps.

I then delayed the phase of one generator by 45 degrees. Although the current in the load resistor remained at 9 amps, the current out of each voltage source jumped up to about 35 amps, and the two output currents were nearly 180 degrees out of phase. I suggest that if you build this circuit that you fuse each alternator at perhaps 20% above the expected peak current.
 
Bob S said:
I simulated your problem with LTSpice. I had two 100-volt 60-Hz in-phase voltage generators in parallel, each with a 1 ohm series resistance. The two outputs were combined in parallel, and the summed current fed to a 10-ohm load resistor. Each voltage source put out about 4.5 amps, and the current in the load resistor was 9 amps.

I then delayed the phase of one generator by 45 degrees. Although the current in the load resistor remained at 9 amps, the current out of each voltage source jumped up to about 35 amps, and the two output currents were nearly 180 degrees out of phase. I suggest that if you build this circuit that you fuse each alternator at perhaps 20% above the expected peak current.


Dear Bob, :smile:

Thanx for your help...but there is a problem here which i am trying to understand since long.:confused: If phase of anyone generator (say Gen A) is increased/decreased, induced EMFs of Gen A and B i.e. Ea and Eb would also increase/decrease respectively. As a result, terminal voltage Vt and bus frequency would also rise/fall accordingly. Then how can output current (at 9 amps) and output power remain constant ? ?

Actually, i had considered similar components i.e. 1 ohm series resistances and 10 ohm load resistance. Ea of Source A was considered a bit higher than Eb of Source B, the circuit considered was DC. I then applied KVL as well as Superposition Theorem to the loop and found that out amps of Source A had increased while that of source B had decreased suitably...but Source B was still taking up load, albeit much lesser than before. Also, Vt and hence load amps had increased accordingly!

Maybe in the above problem, if you consider series impedances (to simulate synchronous reactances of Gen A and B) instead of series resistances but keeping the load purely resistive... then this arrangement might simulate an increase in Vt and cause load current I(load) (and hence output power) to increase accordingly.

Also, I humply request you to provide me suitable phasor diagrams for the same based on the simulations if its not much trouble. :smile:
Plz help me understand this concept as i am pondering on it for quite some time. I will be very much grateful! :frown:

Kind Regards,
Shahvir
 
Last edited:
You are correct in that the model I used for the two alternators is incomplete. In actuality, the permanent magnet motor rotors have inertia, and so if the phase of one leads the other at some given time, then by the exchange of out of phase currents, the relative phase of the two alternators will begin to oscillate, something akin to the phase oscillations of a salient pole synchronous motor when the load is changed. Also, in my model, the power loss in the two series resistors (I squared R losses) goes up nearly a factor of 100 (from 4.5 amps to 35 amps) when the two alternators are 45 degrees out of phase. If the mechanical power driving the alternators cannot supply the required extra torque, the system will stall.

I do not have the tools to give you phasors. Perhaps you could run a Spice model with rotor inertia included.
Bob S.
 
Bob S said:
You are correct in that the model I used for the two alternators is incomplete. In actuality, the permanent magnet motor rotors have inertia, and so if the phase of one leads the other at some given time, then by the exchange of out of phase currents, the relative phase of the two alternators will begin to oscillate, something akin to the phase oscillations of a salient pole synchronous motor when the load is changed. Also, in my model, the power loss in the two series resistors (I squared R losses) goes up nearly a factor of 100 (from 4.5 amps to 35 amps) when the two alternators are 45 degrees out of phase. If the mechanical power driving the alternators cannot supply the required extra torque, the system will stall.

Dear Bob, :smile:

But could you help me with the doubt i mentioned as regards load current remaining constant? It is somewhat difficult to grasp that in spite of rise in bus terminal voltage Vt, load current I(load) remains constant. Kindly help me out here please! :frown:

Kind Regards,
Shahvir
 
Someone please reply to my query :frown:
I'll be very grateful

Kind regards,
Shahvir
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top