Why Can't Fuel Cells Simply Use Water to Generate Hydrogen?

AI Thread Summary
Fuel cells cannot simply use water to generate hydrogen due to significant energy losses in the processes of electrolysis and combustion. While the theoretical energy required to split water into hydrogen and oxygen is equal to the energy produced when burning hydrogen, practical applications face inefficiencies at multiple stages, including energy loss in power plants and during transmission. The energy needed for electrolysis often exceeds the usable energy obtained from burning hydrogen, making the process inefficient. Additionally, sourcing the energy required for electrolysis remains a challenge. Therefore, while the concept is theoretically sound, practical limitations hinder its implementation in fuel cells.
Red Ninja
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if you could recommend an article that would explain a concept to me. That is: the drawback of fuel cells, reportedly, is that hydrogen is not readily available. However, I am wondering why it is that if the original idea of fuel cells came from reversing the concept that hydrogen could be separated from water, why can't fuel cells take water, separate the hydrogen, separate the electrons and then merge them all back together at the other end of the circuit? Basically borrowing the hydrogen electrons for a minute and then returning them back to the water?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why not take a battery, use electricity from it and then return it back to the battery? There are always losses in a system, usually larger than the net output.

If you search around a bit, there have been a few good threads about this in the last couple months with a few links to good websites. Would be worth the effort to search this forum a bit.

Cliff
 
Red Ninja said:
However, I am wondering why it is that if the original idea of fuel cells came from reversing the concept that hydrogen could be separated from water, why can't fuel cells take water, separate the hydrogen, separate the electrons and then merge them all back together at the other end of the circuit? Basically borrowing the hydrogen electrons for a minute and then returning them back to the water?
Splitting water: 2H20+ENERGY->2H2+O2

Burning hydrogen: 2H2+O2->2H2O+ENERGY

As you can see, the reactions are mirror images of each other: the energy is exactly the same in each.
 
russ_watters said:
Splitting water: 2H20+ENERGY->2H2+O2

Burning hydrogen: 2H2+O2->2H2O+ENERGY

As you can see, the reactions are mirror images of each other: the energy is exactly the same in each.

The energy used to split water is the same to the energy produced in the burning process. But, the total amount of energy NEEDED to split water into hydrogen + oxygen is a lot bigger then the energy can be USED when we burn the hydrogen.

We have losses in the power plant, transmission grid, chemical reactor in which we split the water, etc.

In the other end, there is losses in the burning process etc.
 
You can certainly electrolyze water to produce hydrogen, which can then be used in fuel cells. The problem, of course, is where do you get the energy to electrolyze the water?

- Warren
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top