Is chemical engineering ridiculously hard?

AI Thread Summary
Chemical engineering is perceived as challenging but not excessively difficult, with many finding it more tedious than stimulating. The curriculum combines chemistry with significant physics components, which can lead to a perception of boredom among students. Those who enjoy chemistry may still find chemical engineering a suitable choice, but they should be prepared for the physics aspects and the potential for a less engaging experience.
Quantom
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Is chemical engineering ridiculously hard? If i really enjoy chemistry would chem engineering be a good choice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not ridiculously hard, but pretty boring. Its like chemistry mixed with a lot of physics.
 
Howers said:
Not ridiculously hard, but pretty boring. Its like chemistry mixed with a lot of physics.

What do you mean? I'm interested in going to Chemical Engineering too, but I did not expect it to have a lot of physics or be boring.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top