Troubleshooting a Tank Circuit for 60Hz Frequency Matching

  • Thread starter Thread starter Idea04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Tank
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on troubleshooting a parallel LC resonator designed to filter out 60Hz from a range of frequencies. The original circuit uses a non-polar capacitor made from eight polar electrolytic capacitors and an iron core toroidal inductor, but it is not functioning as expected, allowing frequencies to pass through. Suggestions include recalculating the circuit's reactance to around 200 ohms and using proper non-polar capacitor configurations. Alternatives such as implementing a high-pass filter for 100Hz or an active band-pass filter for 60Hz are recommended for better performance. The importance of maintaining a higher impedance to achieve resonance is emphasized, with modeling tools like LTSpice IV suggested for circuit analysis.
Idea04
Messages
194
Reaction score
1
I have built a parallel LC resonator to tune into a specific frequency. the frequency I am tuning into is 60Hz. The problem I am having is that I matched the value of the inductor and the value of the capacitor to match at that frequency within certain tolerance, And the is no signal being filtered. The frequencies are passing right through to the ground connection. Does anyone know I am doing wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There's any number of possible things wrong, but without a schematic I can't even begin to speculate. Including details about what you expect the circuit to accomplish specifically and details about the components used (for example, are the caps aluminum electrolytics, mylar, poly or are the inductors air core, ferrites, tape wound, laminated and which sort of material; silicon steel, 49 material ferrite, etc.) will also be helpful.
 
What I'm trying to do is to separate 60Hz from a wide range of frequencies. the capacitor is a non-polar made from eight polar electrolytic caps. arranged in parallel. The inductor is a iron core toroidal inductor. Also according to the calculations the impedance of the circuit is 0.5 ohm far less that the impedance of the source. If that helps.
 
Idea04 said:
What I'm trying to do is to separate 60Hz from a wide range of frequencies. the capacitor is a non-polar made from eight polar electrolytic caps. arranged in parallel. The inductor is a iron core toroidal inductor. Also according to the calculations the impedance of the circuit is 0.5 ohm far less that the impedance of the source. If that helps.

You don't make a non-polar capacitor by putting polar capacitors in parallel. You can make a non-polar capacitor of half value by putting two polar capacitors in series, with the "+" ends together, for example. This is done in audio circuits frequently.
 
Try recalculating with a reactance of about 200 ohms. O.53 H and 13.26 uF preferably not electrolytic.

Your circuit is basically a short circuit anyway at 60 Hz. The signal source would not be able to deliver the sort of circulating current needed to develop resonance voltages across such low impedance components.

A much better way is to make a high pass filter for 100 Hz rolloff to get rid of 60 hz , or to make an active band pass filter for 60 Hz if you want the 60 Hz.
 
Last edited:
Here are two tank filters suggested above, one a series resonant and the other parallel. with the frequency swept from 40 Hz to 80 Hz. See attached thumbnails. In this case, L=0.53 Henrys, and C = 13.2 microFarads. The impedance is sqrt(L/C) = 200 ohms.
 

Attachments

  • Tank_filter_60Hz.jpg
    Tank_filter_60Hz.jpg
    34.4 KB · Views: 843
  • Tank_ckt2_60Hz.jpg
    Tank_ckt2_60Hz.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 573
Last edited:
Great graphs, Bob S.
Was that done with Spice?

I guess 1 ohm resistance is a bit difficult for a 0.53 H inductance but if it could be held below 20 ohms, to get a Q of at least 10, you would still get reasonable selectivity.
 
The circuit modeling and frequency sweeps were done with LTSpice IV, free from Linear Technology Corp.
 
Back
Top