Is My Laplace Transform Solution Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CentreShifter
  • Start date Start date
CentreShifter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I think there may be a typo in the book, I'm pretty sure I'm doing this correctly.

Use the Laplace transform to solve the IVP: y"-6y'+9y=t; y(0)=0, y'(0)=0

My solution is e^{3t}(1/9*t - 2/27) + 1/9*t + 2/27.

Can someone quickly solve it again for me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CentreShifter said:
I think there may be a typo in the book, I'm pretty sure I'm doing this correctly.

Use the Laplace transform to solve the IVP: y"-6y'+9y; y(0)=0, y'(0)=0

My solution is e^{3t}(1/9*t - 2/27) + 1/9*t + 2/27.

Can someone quickly solve it again for me?

Hi CentreShifter! :smile:

y"-6y'+9y = what? :confused:
 
CentreShifter said:
I think there may be a typo in the book, I'm pretty sure I'm doing this correctly.

Use the Laplace transform to solve the IVP: y"-6y'+9y; y(0)=0, y'(0)=0

My solution is e^{3t}(1/9*t - 2/27) + 1/9*t + 2/27.

Can someone quickly solve it again for me?
Well, what is your differential EQUATION??

Is it: y"-6y'+9y=0 ?

First, we identify that Ae^{3t}[/tex] is, indeed, a double root-solution of the IVP<br /> <br /> In order to find a second solution, we try with:<br /> Bte^{3t}<br /> Inserting this trial solution into our equation yields:<br /> (6Be^{3t}+9Bte^{3t})-6(Be^{3t}+3Bte^{3t})+9Bte^{3t}=0<br /> Note that simplification of the left-hand side yields:<br /> 0=0<br /> <br /> This is precisely what you should have, since you now have two arbitrary parameters, A og B, by which you may adjust your general solution, y=Ae^{3t}+Bte^{3t}, to the initial conditions.<br /> <br /> (Note that this will yield you y=0 as your solution, do you now realize WHY you must state precisely what your diff. eq. actually was?
 
You are both absolutely correct. I was the end of my study session, there should definitely be an equation there. I'll be posting it as soon as I can get to the book.

@arildno - I know this doesn't help right now, but the problem is to be solved using Laplace transforms, not undetermined coefficients (although I suppose t doesn't really matter as long as the solution is correct).

Edit: I have fixed the equation in the first post. It's now correct.
 
Last edited:
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top