How can one solve cubic functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDominis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Functions
AI Thread Summary
To solve the cubic function x^3 - 12x + 1 = 0, one can utilize the relationship x = a - b, where a and b are derived from specific transformations of the function. By letting m = 3ab and n = a^3 - b^3, the equation can be reformulated into a quadratic form for a^3. The quadratic formula provides a means to find a^3, which can then be used to determine a and subsequently b. Ultimately, the solution for x is obtained by calculating x = a - b, illustrating that solving cubic functions involves a systematic approach to manipulate and simplify the equations.
TheDominis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
x3 - 12x + 1 = 0

How does one solve for x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let x= a- b. Then a^3= (a-b)^3= a^3- 3a^2b+ 3ab^2- b^3.

Also 3abx= 3ab(a- b)= 3a^2b- 3ab^2.

So x^3+ 3abx= a^3- b^3. Letting m= 3ab and n= a^3- b^3, then x= a-b satisfies x^3+ mx= n.

Suppose we know m and n- can we "recover" a and b and so find x?

If m= 3ab, then b= m/3a and n= a^3- m^3/3^3a^3. Multiplying through by a^3 we get na^3= (a^3)^2- m^3/3^3 which we can think of as a quadratic equation for a^3: (a^3)^2- na^3- m^3/3^3= 0 and solve by the quadratic formula:
a^3= \frac{n\pm\sqrt{n^2+ 4\frac{m^3}{m^3}}}{2}= \frac{n}{2}\pm\sqrt{\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}
so that
a= \sqrt[3]{\frac{n}{2}\pm\sqrt{\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}}}

Since a^3- b^3= n, b^3= a^3- n so
b^3= -\frac{n}{2}\pm\sqrt{\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}
and
b= -\sqrt[3]{\frac{n}{2}\pm\sqrt{\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{m}{3}\right)^3}}}
and, of course, x= a- b.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top