Relation between occupation probability and first passage probability

WiFO215
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
Let P(r,t) define the occupation probability, the probability that a particle emulating a random walk will find itself at position r at time t if starts from the origin at time zero.

Let F(r,t) define the first passage probability, the probability that a particle emulating a random walk will find itself at position r at time t FOR THE FIRST TIME if starts from the origin at time zero.

I was reading a book which says this :
"For a random walk to be at position r at time t, the walk must first reach r at some earlier time step t' and then return to r after t-t' additional steps. This connection between F(r,t) and P(r,t) can thus be expressed by the equation

P(r,t) = \delta_{r0} \delta_{t0} + \sum_{t'\leqt}F(r,t')P(0,t-t')

"

Can someone please explain how this is possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For some reason, I cannot edit the above. It is supposed to read t' \leq t below the summation sign.
 
Can someone move this to the Classical Physics subforum? I might probably get more replies there.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top