Relation between occupation probability and first passage probability

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Relation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between occupation probability, P(r,t), and first passage probability, F(r,t), in the context of random walks. It highlights the equation P(r,t) = δr0 δt0 + ∑t'≤t F(r,t')P(0,t-t'), which establishes that for a particle to be at position r at time t, it must first reach r at an earlier time t' and then return after additional steps. This mathematical framework is crucial for understanding random walk dynamics and their implications in various fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of random walk theory
  • Familiarity with probability theory
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and summation
  • Basic concepts of statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the first passage time distribution in random walks
  • Explore applications of random walks in statistical physics
  • Learn about the implications of occupation probabilities in complex systems
  • Investigate the role of Markov processes in random walks
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and researchers interested in stochastic processes, particularly those studying random walks and their applications in statistical mechanics and complex systems.

WiFO215
Messages
417
Reaction score
1
Let P(r,t) define the occupation probability, the probability that a particle emulating a random walk will find itself at position r at time t if starts from the origin at time zero.

Let F(r,t) define the first passage probability, the probability that a particle emulating a random walk will find itself at position r at time t FOR THE FIRST TIME if starts from the origin at time zero.

I was reading a book which says this :
"For a random walk to be at position r at time t, the walk must first reach r at some earlier time step t' and then return to r after t-t' additional steps. This connection between F(r,t) and P(r,t) can thus be expressed by the equation

[tex]P(r,t) = \delta_{r0} \delta_{t0} + \sum_{t'\leqt}F(r,t')P(0,t-t')[/tex]

"

Can someone please explain how this is possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For some reason, I cannot edit the above. It is supposed to read t' [tex]\leq[/tex] t below the summation sign.
 
Can someone move this to the Classical Physics subforum? I might probably get more replies there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
890
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K