What is the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in higher dimensions?

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Dear guys,

I want to understand the spinors in various dimensions and Clifford algebra. I tried to read the appendix B of Polchinski's volume II of his string theory book. But it's hard for me to follow and I stuck in the very beginning. I will try to figure out the outline and post my questions later.

For now, I want to ask for very simple, introductory articles for the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in various dimensions. (Is the appendix B of Polchinski the simplest article among all?:blushing:)

Thanks for your help!

Ismaili
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
 
haushofer said:
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}<br />
In the even dimension, d = 2k+2, one can group the \gamma^\mu into k+1 sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
<br /> \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})<br />
where a=1,2,\cdots, k.
One then found that,
<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0<br />
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of k species of fermions. In particular, from
(\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0
one sees there exist a vacuum |\xi\rangle annihilated by all \gamma^{a-}.
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
<br /> (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle<br />
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of k species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is 2^{k+1}.

In d = 2, one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ -1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2
\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ 1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by d \rightarrow d+2. But now comes my question, for d = 6
<br /> \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \quad\quad\quad\vdots<br />
<br /> \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1<br />
<br /> \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2<br />
where I is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use \textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!
 
ismaili said:
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}<br />
In the even dimension, d = 2k+2, one can group the \gamma^\mu into k+1 sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
<br /> \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})<br />
where a=1,2,\cdots, k.
One then found that,
<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0<br />
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of k species of fermions. In particular, from
(\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0
one sees there exist a vacuum |\xi\rangle annihilated by all \gamma^{a-}.
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
<br /> (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle<br />
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of k species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is 2^{k+1}.

In d = 2, one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ -1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2
\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &amp;1\\ 1 &amp;0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by d \rightarrow d+2. But now comes my question, for d = 6
<br /> \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}<br />
<br /> \quad\quad\quad\vdots<br />
<br /> \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1<br />
<br /> \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2<br />
where I is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use \textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!

I think I know the answer to the use of \sigma^3.
The gamma matrices in d = 2 invole only \sigma^1, \sigma^2.
When we add the spacetime dimension by 2,
in order to get the correct anti-commutation relations,
we have to tensor product the original gamma matrices by \sigma^3.

-----

After figuring out the construction of higher dimensional gamma matrices,
I was confused by the suddenly born conjugation matrix B and charge conjugation matrix C
...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top