Basis Transformation for Wave Function

Proofrific
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It's not a homework problem. I'm reading my textbook (Sakurai's Modern QM), and I'm not sure about a step (eq 3.6.6 through 3.6.8). Here it is:

We start with a wave function that's been rotated:
\langle x' + y' \delta \phi, y' - x' \delta \phi, z' | \alpha \rangle

Now, we change the coordinate basis from Cartesian to spherical. That is,
\langle x', y', z' | \alpha \rangle \to \langle r, \theta, \phi | \alpha \rangle

I want to show that the previous wave function transforms to:
\langle r, \theta, \phi - \delta \phi | \alpha \rangle

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Physically, I understand that we're rotating by angle \delta \phi about the z-axis. So, it makes sense that the bra would acquire a -\delta \phi (the ket would acquire a positive). But, I'm not sure how to mathematically show the steps (which is needed for more complicated transforms, such as Sakurai eq. 3.6.10 to 3.6.11).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are essentially acting the rotation operator, \mathcal{D}, on the bra in the spherical wavefunction:

<br /> \langle r,\theta,\phi|\mathcal{D}|\alpha\rangle=\langle r,\theta,\phi\left|1-i\left(\frac{\delta\phi}{\hbar}\right)L_z\right|\alpha\rangle=\langle r,\theta,\phi-\delta\phi|\alpha\rangle<br />

Mathematically, you are multiplying each term in \langle r,\theta,\phi| by \mathcal{D}, but since L_zr=L_z\theta=0, you are left with

<br /> \langle r,\theta,\phi|\mathcal{D}=\langle r\mathcal{D},\theta\mathcal{D},\phi\mathcal{D}|\rightarrow\left.\langle r,\theta,\phi\left(1-i\left(\frac{\delta\phi}{\hbar}\right)L_z\right)\right|=\langle r,\theta,\phi-\delta\phi|<br />

Equations (3.6.10) and (3.6.11) use the "known result from wave mechanics" in Equation (3.6.9):

<br /> \langle\mathbf{x}&#039;|L_z|\alpha\rangle=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}\langle\mathbf{x}&#039;|\alpha\rangle<br />

and this is not the same as the second equation above because you do not have the \propto(1-\delta\phi L_z) acting on the bra, you just have L_x, L_y, or L_z. Converting L_x and L_y from Cartesian into spherical should give you Equations (3.6.10) and (3.6.11) when using the "known result" of Equation (3.6.9)
 
jdwood983 said:
Mathematically, you are multiplying each term in \langle r,\theta,\phi| by \mathcal{D}, but since L_zr=L_z\theta=0, you are left with

Thanks for the help!

How do you know that L_zr=L_z\theta=0? The only thing I remember about L_z is how it acts on an eigenstate: L_z|l,m\rangle = m \hbar | l,m \rangle. How do you know how it acts on r, \theta, and \phi?
 
Proofrific said:
Thanks for the help!

How do you know that L_zr=L_z\theta=0? The only thing I remember about L_z is how it acts on an eigenstate: L_z|l,m\rangle = m \hbar | l,m \rangle. How do you know how it acts on r, \theta, and \phi?

Well L_z is an operator equivalent to

<br /> L_z=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}<br />

So since r and \theta have no \phi component, L_z acting on them would be zero.
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top