Is Stefan's Law Truly Valid at All Temperatures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the4thamigo_uk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Uv
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of Stefan-Boltzmann law at high temperatures, questioning whether it truly holds for real bodies. The lecturer suggests that the law may break down at elevated temperatures, leading to a scenario where a body could stop radiating and continue to heat up indefinitely, which raises concerns about thermodynamic equilibrium. The conversation highlights the complexity of real-world absorption and emission spectra, noting that interatomic bonds and electron transitions complicate the theoretical models. Despite these complexities, the discussion concludes that it is remarkable that all bodies can still radiate enough energy to maintain thermodynamic equilibrium. The validity of the T^4 law across all temperatures remains a central point of inquiry.
the4thamigo_uk
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I was watching two small lectures on youtube about black body radiation, they are interesting but I am questioning some of the information they provide :

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=254B23CEE44ABE58&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&v=6tikmVfrQrk

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=254B23CEE44ABE58&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&v=xF4D6fS-KA8

My question is related to the graph of the Stefan-Boltzman law that the lecturer draws on the blackboard. Specifically he introduces the law as usual saying that the total power radiated by a body at temperature T, scales as the fourth power of T. This is fine. He then says that experimentally this law breaks down for real bodies and drops off to zero at high temperatures. Is this true?

If it was true then if I heat a real body beyond a certain temperature then it will stop radiating, hence it cannot maintain thermodynamic equilibrium and will just heat up, increase its temperature and radiate even less, heat up even more etc.?

My understanding is that this is not explained by the ultraviolet catastrophe (which seems to be an entirely different thing). In particular from wikipedia, it is possible to derive the T^4 law from Plancks law as well classical thermodynamics, so solving the UV catastrophe does not change Stefans Law. So the T^4 law must be true at all temperatures in the real world right?




A further thought occurs to me which is touched on in the lecturer with the 'rock star' example. In the real world, interatomic molecular bonds radiate in the infra red, electron orbital changes radiate in the UV. There is therefore a discontinuous distribution of absorption. Furthermore at certain temperatures interatomic bonds might break and essentially free the atoms from each other, or electrons might escape their orbitals. In other words the absorbtion/emission spectrums are very complicated!

So, the theoretical model obviously doesn't take any of this into account, Plancks little oscillators appear to have an infinite number of energy levels. So I guess they are really analogous to interatomic bonds which never break and there are no other forms of electromagnetic emission and the particles never escape the potential well. This ok?

So, given that the real world is complicated and that no real object really emits Plancks spectrum, isn't it remarkable? that all bodies can radiate enough energy to maintain thermodynamic equilibrium?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does anyone have a comment on this?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top