Is Stefan's Law Truly Valid at All Temperatures?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter the4thamigo_uk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Uv
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of Stefan's Law at all temperatures, particularly in relation to black body radiation. The law states that the total power radiated by a body at temperature T scales as T^4. However, participants question the applicability of this law to real bodies at high temperatures, where it appears to break down and cease radiation. The conversation highlights the complexities of real-world emission spectra and the implications for thermodynamic equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stefan-Boltzmann Law
  • Familiarity with black body radiation concepts
  • Knowledge of Planck's Law and its derivation
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of high-temperature behavior on Stefan-Boltzmann Law
  • Explore the complexities of real body emission spectra
  • Study the relationship between interatomic bonds and radiation
  • Investigate thermodynamic equilibrium in non-ideal systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, thermodynamics researchers, and students studying black body radiation and its real-world applications.

the4thamigo_uk
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I was watching two small lectures on youtube about black body radiation, they are interesting but I am questioning some of the information they provide :

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=254B23CEE44ABE58&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&v=6tikmVfrQrk

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=254B23CEE44ABE58&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&v=xF4D6fS-KA8

My question is related to the graph of the Stefan-Boltzmann law that the lecturer draws on the blackboard. Specifically he introduces the law as usual saying that the total power radiated by a body at temperature T, scales as the fourth power of T. This is fine. He then says that experimentally this law breaks down for real bodies and drops off to zero at high temperatures. Is this true?

If it was true then if I heat a real body beyond a certain temperature then it will stop radiating, hence it cannot maintain thermodynamic equilibrium and will just heat up, increase its temperature and radiate even less, heat up even more etc.?

My understanding is that this is not explained by the ultraviolet catastrophe (which seems to be an entirely different thing). In particular from wikipedia, it is possible to derive the T^4 law from Plancks law as well classical thermodynamics, so solving the UV catastrophe does not change Stefans Law. So the T^4 law must be true at all temperatures in the real world right?




A further thought occurs to me which is touched on in the lecturer with the 'rock star' example. In the real world, interatomic molecular bonds radiate in the infra red, electron orbital changes radiate in the UV. There is therefore a discontinuous distribution of absorption. Furthermore at certain temperatures interatomic bonds might break and essentially free the atoms from each other, or electrons might escape their orbitals. In other words the absorption/emission spectrums are very complicated!

So, the theoretical model obviously doesn't take any of this into account, Plancks little oscillators appear to have an infinite number of energy levels. So I guess they are really analogous to interatomic bonds which never break and there are no other forms of electromagnetic emission and the particles never escape the potential well. This ok?

So, given that the real world is complicated and that no real object really emits Plancks spectrum, isn't it remarkable? that all bodies can radiate enough energy to maintain thermodynamic equilibrium?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Does anyone have a comment on this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K