Hartle Gravity - Simple basis vector question

CFDFEAGURU
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Helo all,

I have a very simple question about basis Four-Vectors and Components. In Hartle's book, Gravity, he uses the following equation to show the components of the 4-vector, a

a =a^t{}e(sub t) + a^x{}e(sub x) + a^y{}e(sub y) + a^z{}e(sub z)

Sorry for the half LaTex half something else but I couln't get the subscript LaTex command to work right. All it did was create another superscript.

Here is my question:

The e(subs) are a unit vector so there value should be -1 for the t component and 1 for the x, y, and z components correct?

For example, (this is problem 5.1)

The components of the 4-vector a^\alpha{} are (-2,0,0,1)

Is a timelike, spacelike, or null?

The value of a\alpha = -2(-1) + 0(1) + 0(1) + 1(1) = -1

Since -1 < 0, a is timelike.

Is the above correct ?

Thanks
Matt
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not. If this is special relativity, the basis vectors are just the standard basis vectors of \mathbb R^4. e_0=(1,0,0,0),\ e_1=(0,1,0,0) and so on. If it's general relativity, we're talking about basis vectors for the tangent space, and every coordinate system defines a basis as described here.

To determine if a four-vector u is timelike, null or spacelike, you must check if u^2=g_{\alpha\beta}u^\alpha u^\beta is <0, =0, or >0 respectively. If we're talking about the Minkowski metric with the -+++ convention, you have u^2=-(u^0)^2+(u^1)^2+(u^2)^2+(u^3)^2.
 
Fredrik,

Thanks.

The "unit" vector was causing me the confusion.

So the correct calculation for the value of a is

The value of a = -(-2(-2))+ 0(0) + 0(0) + 1(1) = -3

and a is timelike.

glamotte was also helping me out with this but the "unit" vector was causing me some confusion.

Thanks
Matt
 
It's the correct calculation, but what you're calculating isn't a, it's a2:

a^2=a^T\eta a=-(a^0)^2+(a^1)^2+(a^2)^2+(a^3)^2=(-2)^2+0^2+0^2+1^2=-3&lt;0
 
Yes, sorry for that. I understood it to be a^2, I just didn't show it in my post.

Thanks for the correction.

Matt
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top