Spin of the Pion: Neutral Decay Proves Integral Spin

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pion Spin
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I have a question from Perkins:

For neutral pions, the existence of the decay
\pi^{0} \longrightarrow 2\gamma

proves that the pion spin must be integral (since Sy = 1) and that s_\pi \neq 1, from the following argument. It can be proved as a consequence of relativistic invariance that for any massless particle of spin s, there are only two possible spin substates, S_z = \pm s, where z is the direction of motion. Taking the common line of flight of the photons in the pion rest frame as the quantisation axis, the z-component of total photon spin in the above decay can thus have the values Sz = 0 or 2. Suppose s_\pi = 1; then only S_z = 0 is possible, and the two-photon amplitude must behave under rotation like the polynomial P_{l}^{m}(\cos \theta) with m = 0, where \theta is the angle of the photon relative to the z-axis.

I'm not sure I understand the line in boldface. If s_\pi = 1 then why is S_z = 0?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of angular momentum. two is larger than one!
 
xepma said:
Conservation of angular momentum. two is larger than one!

Yes. Right, but does Sz = 0 explicitly conserve angular momentum? How do I convince myself?
 
Back
Top