Subspace/induced/relative Topology Definition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying the definition of subspace, induced, or relative topology in the context of a topological space (A, τ) and a subset B ⊆ A. The subspace topology on B is defined as the intersection of B with each open set in the topology of A, leading to the formulation τB = {B ∩ U | U ∈ τ}. A misunderstanding arises from assuming only finitely many open sets exist, while the discussion emphasizes that the notation is illustrative. The standard set-builder notation is explained, indicating that U represents elements of the topology τ. The conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions and explanations in topology resources.
filter54321
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding the definition of a Subspace/Induced/Relative Topology. The definitions I'm finding either don't define symbols well (at all).

If I understand correctly the definition is:

Given:
-topological space (A,\tau)
-\tau={0,A,u1,u2,...un}
-subset B\subsetA

The subspace topology on B will be the intersection of B and every part of the topology of A

OR

\tauB={0,B,B\bigcapu1,B\bigcapu2,...B\bigcapun}


...I apologize in advance for my LATEX work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That looks correct idea for the subspace topology... but there is a serious problem in your understanding of topology: you seem to be assuming there are only finitely many open sets.
 
The u's are finite for illustrative purposes. I wanted to avoid using the form given by Wikipedia because it has insufficient textual explanation.

They have this definition, but don't specify exactly what a U is:

\tauB={B\bigcapU|U\in\tau}

It seems that me that you need to say how U fits into the first topology.
 
filter54321 said:
They have this definition, but don't specify exactly what a U is:
Yes they do: they say a U is an element of \tau.

This is standard set-builder syntax for replacement: on the right of | you introduce a variable and its domain, and on the left of the | you have a function of that variable indicating what should go into the set you're building.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top