Understanding Cross Sections and Lifetimes: Questions 3 and 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cross
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372

Homework Statement


In the attached file, I need some help with questions 3 and 4.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


For question 4, I get the next answers:
a. The flux is given by:
f=\frac{v_{\nu}\rho}{m} where m is the mass of the iron nucleus, rho is the iron density and v_{\nu} is the nuetrino speed.

b. If I get this right then \frac{N_{events}}{N_{particles}}=\frac{\sigma_{\nu}f dx}{v_{\nu}}, and the number of scattered nuetrinos is N(x) times this fraction, i.e:
dN= \frac{\sigma_{\nu}f dx}{v_{\nu}}N.

c. easy as well, just identifying the above constant minus a sign with lambda.

d. Here is where I am findining it hard, I need to multiply sigma_{\nu} with some constant in order to eliminate the dimensions of energy in this cross section, I don't know how to do it, any hints as to how reconcile this?

The other questions are plug-and-calculate which aren't hard.

For question 3, I am not sure how to answer this question, any hints?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The attachment.
 

Attachments

Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top