Looking for a coordinate system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a suitable coordinate system for a Cartesian framework with periodic properties. The system exhibits symmetry across non-adjacent squares, requiring a transformation that accommodates specific wrapping behaviors in both the x and y dimensions. The y-dimension wraps at boundary b, while the x-dimension requires a shift that complicates the transition from a cylinder to a torus. The user seeks suggestions for a coordinate system that can manage these periodicities, noting that traditional toroidal coordinates may not suffice. The conversation highlights the need for local coordinates and manifold concepts to address the complexity of the system.
coolnessitself
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm working with a cartestian system that has certain periodic properties I'd like to exploit with a new coordinate system, but I don't know one that would work. The trajectory of the state of the system is symmetric across non-adjacent squares (ie a checkerboard of sorts), so that (x,y) can always be contained in [-a, a], [-b, b], if the following are true. Along y, the plane wraps up on itself at b, so that (x,-b)=(x,b). For x, if the state travels beyond a, it goes back to -a, but y will also be shifted, so that (a,y) = (-a,y+b). Note that this shift might also cause a jump in y from (x,-b)=(x,b).
So wrapping in y means I curl my cartesian into a cylinder, and the wrapping in x might change the cylinder into a torus, but it would have to be twisted somehow so that (a,y) = (a,y+b), which toroidal coordinates wouldn't allow(?). I'm not really sure what to search for. Suggestions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Coordinates with periodicity aren't unique anymore and so no longer coordinates. Mathematicians solve this problem by using local coordinates and patch them, i.e. consider your surface as a manifold with an atlas.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top