hholzer
- 36
- 0
I'm given the following:
If \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = f(x,y)
then
<br /> \int \int_R f(x,y) dA = F(b,d) - F(a, d) - F(b, c) + F(a, c)<br />
Where R = [a,b] x [c,d]
My question: by integrating the inner integral, we get:
<br /> \int_a^b \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} dx = \left[ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}\right]_a^b<br />
But this result is F_y. I was expecting F_x. Why? Because:
<br /> \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = F_xy<br />
Which means: we differentiate with respect to x, then with respect to y.
The result above seemingly implies that we differentiated with
respect to y, then with respect to x. Hence, integrating F_yx,
gives F_y, is this not correct? Or do they apply fubini's theorem
and Clairaut's theorem above?
If \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = f(x,y)
then
<br /> \int \int_R f(x,y) dA = F(b,d) - F(a, d) - F(b, c) + F(a, c)<br />
Where R = [a,b] x [c,d]
My question: by integrating the inner integral, we get:
<br /> \int_a^b \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} dx = \left[ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}\right]_a^b<br />
But this result is F_y. I was expecting F_x. Why? Because:
<br /> \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x \partial y} = F_xy<br />
Which means: we differentiate with respect to x, then with respect to y.
The result above seemingly implies that we differentiated with
respect to y, then with respect to x. Hence, integrating F_yx,
gives F_y, is this not correct? Or do they apply fubini's theorem
and Clairaut's theorem above?
Last edited: