Calculating the Number of Gas Molecules in an Excellent Laboratory Vacuum

  • Thread starter Thread starter noname1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Molecules
AI Thread Summary
An excellent laboratory vacuum with a pressure of 4.00x10^-18 atm corresponds to a gas density calculation using the ideal gas law. The initial calculation yielded 1.66x10^-22 mol/cm³, but it required verification and unit adjustments. The correct approach involves converting the gas density to molecules per cubic centimeter by multiplying by Avogadro's number. After correcting the units and calculations, the final result indicates approximately 99.97 molecules per cubic centimeter. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in gas law calculations.
noname1
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
An excellent laboratory vacuum has a pressure of 4.00x10^-18 atm, or 4.04x10^-13 Pa. How many gas molecules are there per cubic centimeter in such a vacuum at 297 K?

n/v = p/rt


n/v = 4.04x10^-13 / (8.31x297) = 1.66x10^-16 mol/m³

1.66x10^-16 mol/m³ * (1/100cm)³ = 1.66x10^-22 mol/cm³

but something is wrong, please verify and she what i am doing wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1 mole contains how many molecules?
 
rock.freak667 said:
1 mole contains how many molecules?

6.022x10^23
 
Last edited:
noname1 said:
6.22x10^23

And you have 1.66x10-22 moles, so how many molecules do you have?


Actually now that I see it, you are finding per cm3.

R has the units J/mol.K

J = 1 Pa m3, so you'll need to change your units for R for it to work out properly.
 
ok i see it now i forgot to multiply by (6.022x10^23/mol)

i only got 1 more try at answering this question :(

(1.66x10^-16 mol/m³) * (m/100cm)³ * (6.022x10^23/mol) = 99.97 molecules/cm³

am i correct now?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top