Do Different Materials with the Same Mass Have the Same Number of Protons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bolbol2054
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Protons
AI Thread Summary
1 kg of iron contains the same number of protons as 1 kg of aluminum, hydrogen, or wood when comparing their atomic structures, but the total mass is defined by the number of protons and neutrons (P + N) in each element. Neutrons have a mass nearly equal to protons, making it feasible to define mass based on these particles. The binding energy in atomic nuclei introduces minimal errors, typically under 1%. Understanding the relationship between mass and atomic composition is crucial for accurate scientific measurements. This discussion highlights the importance of protons and neutrons in defining the mass of different materials.
bolbol2054
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
my question is
Does 1 kg of iron contain the same number of protons as 1kg of aluminium,hydrogen and wood
Can we define mass of matter with no of protons and neutrons it contains?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bolbol2054! :smile:

A neutron weighs almost exactly the same as a proton, and most elements have more neutrons than protons, so you would have to define mass of matter with the number of protons and neutrons (P + N) it contains.

If you did, it would be pretty accurate …

the errors (due to "binding energy") would be well under 1%: see the tables in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bindin..._experimentally_measured_atom_nuclide_masses" for some detailed figures. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you sir
 
don't call me sir!

i'm only a little goldfish! :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top