How Can We Calculate the Radius of Gyration for a Rotating Disk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mather
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk Mass Point
AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent point mass for a rotating disk, one must consider the radius of gyration, which accounts for the distribution of mass around the axis. The radius of gyration is less than the disk's radius, as not all mass is located at the outer edge. This radius is crucial for calculating angular acceleration and other rotational dynamics. The concept emphasizes that while the mass cannot be simplified to a single point without affecting stability, it can be modeled as a ring with the same mass and an appropriate radius of gyration. Understanding this relationship is essential for accurate rotational motion calculations.
mather
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
hello

imagine a disk rotating by an axis that passes through the center of the disk

how can we find the analogue of a mass rotating by an axis?

I mean, how can we lump the whole mass of the wheel to a point?

how much will be the distance of this point from the axis?

for example to rotate a disk with radius 10 and mass 100 you need the same force as to rotate a point of mass 100 and rotation radius = ??

I suppose the radius will be some less than 10 (since not all parts of the disk are at this radius), but how much exactly?

thanks

PS: we need to do this in order to calculate other things, eg angular acceleration, etc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello mather! :smile:
mather said:
imagine a disk rotating by an axis that passes through the center of the disk
… how can we lump the whole mass of the wheel to a point?

how much will be the distance of this point from the axis?

We can't lump it to a point (because it needs to have the same centre of mass as the disc, otherwise it will wobble :redface:), but we can lump it to a ring, with the same mass as the disc, and whose radius is the radius of gyration

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_gyration" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top