Intersection of ellipses and equivalent problems

AI Thread Summary
Determining whether two ellipses intersect can be complex, often leading to solving 4th order polynomials, which can be cumbersome. Some users suggest that there might be simpler methods to ascertain intersection points without needing to solve for them explicitly. Equivalent problems involving trigonometric functions and complex numbers were mentioned as potential avenues for exploration. One user attempted to use discriminants and Cartesian coordinates to simplify the equations but encountered difficulties. Ultimately, numerical methods may provide the most practical solution for determining intersections between ellipses.
Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
Does anyone know how to determine whether two ellipses intersect? I don't need the precise points but rather only the answer whether there are points. All my attempts led to 4th order polynomials, which are heavy to solve, but considering that I don't need the actual points I assume there must be an easier way.

Some guy claims it's doable
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/htdocs/dcforum/DCForumID6/710.shtml

Here are some equivalent problems which have to be solved for the angles (which however I can't solve either...)
\cos\phi+a\sin\theta=x
\sin\phi+b\cos\theta=y
or even
\Re(e^{i\theta}(1+ze^{i\theta}))=q
where z is complex, is an equivalent problem. Any ideas?

My best attempt so far was using discriminants, but it's messy and I made a mistake somewhere...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would eliminate the angles by squaring and write the equations in Cartesian coordinates. Then we have still a quadratic equation in two variables, which one can be normalized by a coordinate transformation, such that we end up with ##y=\pm \frac{b}{a}\sqrt{a^2-x^2}## with one of the two ellipsis. This can be substituted into the other equation, such that we have only one equation in ##x##. It is probably easiest to determine it numerically by one the tools available on the internet.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top