Coordinate conjugate to momentum.

AI Thread Summary
In a system with one degree of freedom described by a Lagrangian L[x, \dot x], momentum is defined as p = ∂L/∂\dot x. A change of coordinates x to y leads to a new Lagrangian M[y, \dot y] and a corresponding momentum q = ∂M/∂\dot y. The discussion centers on finding the transformation from momenta p to q and how to reverse this process to derive the coordinate transformation from q back to p. It suggests that understanding canonical transformations and generating functions is essential for this process. Exploring resources like Wikipedia on canonical transformations is recommended for further clarity.
Petr Mugver
Messages
279
Reaction score
0
Let's take a system, for simplicity with only one degree of freedom, described by a certain lagrangian

L[x,\dot x]

I define the momentum

p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x}

Now, if I make a change of coordinates

x\longmapsto y\qquad\qquad\qquad(1)

I obtain a second lagrangian

M[y,\dot y]=L[x(y(t)),\partial_t x(y(t))]

and I can define a second momentum

q=\frac{\partial M}{\partial\dot y}

My question is, if instead of the transformation (1) I want to consider the transformation of the momenta

p\longmapsto q\qquad\qquad\qquad(2)

How can I find the corresponding transformation (1)? In other words, given that I know how to do (1)-->(2), how can I do (2)-->(1)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to read some material about canonical transformations.
Maybe wiki is a good start:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_transformation

Once you are on the starting block, read about generating functions.
The last section "Modern mathematical description" is like a summary.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top