Can Mirrors Boost the Efficiency of a Portable Solar Panel Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
Using mirrors to enhance the efficiency of solar panels in a portable energy project can be beneficial, but the panels should ideally face the sun directly for optimal performance. Placing mirrors around the edges of the setup may help reflect additional light onto the panels without obstructing direct sunlight. Enclosing the battery in a sphere could raise concerns about heat buildup and ventilation, potentially leading to safety issues. The design should also consider the size and shadow cast by the sphere, as excessive shading could hinder energy production. Overall, tracking the sun's position would significantly improve efficiency, making it a worthwhile consideration for the project.
Katie_Bear
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
(I would've put this in the homework section except it didn't follow the template.. :P I'm really sorry)

For a Science Fair project I want to make a portable energy source with solar panels. I'm thinking of making a cube of panels with the deep cycle battery within the cube. Then to make it more structurally sound I could put a plexiglass sphere around the cube with supports holding the cube in the middle.

I'm wondering if I could place a mirror in the sphere (or replace part of the plastic sphere with a mirror) to make the panels more efficient? Does this make any sense? I'm thinking the mirror would take up most of the bottom half of the sphere when it's on the ground... Or would multiple mirrors be better if I do end up using mirrors.

Would putting the battery within an enclosed spot like this turn out very, very bad?

Would the sphere plus the glass covering create too much shadow over the cells to create enough energy?

I just started throwing this idea around so I haven't really attempted to put any specs together yet, but I'm assuming this would have to be pretty large to be worthwile. About the size of a fitness orb maybe?

Is this even a feasible project? i just figured that since they banned volcanoes I should go all out ;D.

Or should I just give'r and see what happens?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Katie_Bear said:
(I would've put this in the homework section except it didn't follow the template.. :P I'm really sorry)

For a Science Fair project I want to make a portable energy source with solar panels. I'm thinking of making a cube of panels with the deep cycle battery within the cube. Then to make it more structurally sound I could put a plexiglass sphere around the cube with supports holding the cube in the middle.

I'm wondering if I could place a mirror in the sphere (or replace part of the plastic sphere with a mirror) to make the panels more efficient? Does this make any sense? I'm thinking the mirror would take up most of the bottom half of the sphere when it's on the ground... Or would multiple mirrors be better if I do end up using mirrors.

Would putting the battery within an enclosed spot like this turn out very, very bad?

Would the sphere plus the glass covering create too much shadow over the cells to create enough energy?

I just started throwing this idea around so I haven't really attempted to put any specs together yet, but I'm assuming this would have to be pretty large to be worthwile. About the size of a fitness orb maybe?

Is this even a feasible project? i just figured that since they banned volcanoes I should go all out ;D.

Or should I just give'r and see what happens?

Welcome to the PF!

It will be most efficient if you can have the sunlight hit all of the solar cells at normal incidence (straight on). So pointing cells away from the direction of the sun is generally not a good idea, even with some mirror setup. If you want to use mirrors to gather more light, you would probably still want to keep the panel(s) facing the sun, and put the mirrors around the edges to bounce more light onto the panel(s).

Can you do any tracking of the sun with your project? That should be the most efficient arrangement, as long as you don't use much power to move the panel(s).
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top