Superposition and Electrostatic Force

AI Thread Summary
In a system of three charged particles arranged in a line, the net force on the third particle is determined by the forces exerted by both the first and second particles. The superposition principle allows for the calculation of the net force by treating the influence of each particle independently, meaning the first particle can exert a force on the third particle regardless of the second particle's presence. The electric field at the location of the third particle is the vector sum of the fields created by the first and second particles. This results in a net force that can be expressed as the sum of the individual forces from each particle. Understanding this principle clarifies how interactions occur even when charges are separated by another charge.
AirForceOne
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have three charged particles arranged in a line, the first one being negative, the second being positive, and the third being negative.

If we want to find the net force on the third particle, we sum the force from the second particle on the third and the force from the first particle on the third.

Apparently, there is a force between the first and third particle. According to the book, this is due to the superposition principle, in which the first particle acts on the third as if the second particle is not there.

Flipping to the part about superposition, the book simply states that, by superposition, the net force on anyone of them will be the vector sum of the forces due to each of the others.

This explanation doesn't really help me understand how it is possible for there to be a force between the first and third particle. Can anyone explain how the superposition shows this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean to say that the presence of the second charge in between the 1st & 3rd would prevent any interaction between them ?
 
Superposition principle states that the electric field caused by two particles is the vector sum of the fields caused by each particle. Is that clear enough?

What generates force on a charged particle at rest is the electric field at that point. The electric field will be given by sum of the fields from first and second particles.

F_3 = q_3 E = q_3 (E_1 + E_2) = q_3 E_1 + q_3 E_2

But that's just sum of the forces caused by q1 alone and q2 alone.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top