Peskin-Schroeder - Eqn 2.45 derivation

  • Thread starter Thread starter giant_bog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
giant_bog
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems with the equations leading up to eqn 2.45 on page 25. The hamiltonian has a (\nabla\phi)^2 + m^2 \phi^2 term in the \phi(x) commutator and in the \pi(x) commutator it's \phi(-\nabla^2 + m^2) \phi.

I'm aware of a vector calculus identity that makes (\nabla\phi)^2 = 1/2 (\nabla^2[\phi^2]) - \phi \nabla^2 \phi.

That's almost what we have here, but the \frac{1}{2}(\nabla^2[\phi^2]) term is missing in the \pi(x) commutator.

Did anybody see where it went?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the n-1 boundary term which is taken be zero.
 
You can do this kind of thing using integration by parts. E.g., in one dimension:

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)^2 dx = \left[f(x) \frac{df}{dx}\right]_{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\frac{d^2 f}{dx^2}dx

And if f(x) goes to zero at infinity then the first term on the right drops out.
 
I see it now. Thanks, folks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top