giant_bog
- 13
- 0
I'm having problems with the equations leading up to eqn 2.45 on page 25. The hamiltonian has a (\nabla\phi)^2 + m^2 \phi^2 term in the \phi(x) commutator and in the \pi(x) commutator it's \phi(-\nabla^2 + m^2) \phi.
I'm aware of a vector calculus identity that makes (\nabla\phi)^2 = 1/2 (\nabla^2[\phi^2]) - \phi \nabla^2 \phi.
That's almost what we have here, but the \frac{1}{2}(\nabla^2[\phi^2]) term is missing in the \pi(x) commutator.
Did anybody see where it went?
I'm aware of a vector calculus identity that makes (\nabla\phi)^2 = 1/2 (\nabla^2[\phi^2]) - \phi \nabla^2 \phi.
That's almost what we have here, but the \frac{1}{2}(\nabla^2[\phi^2]) term is missing in the \pi(x) commutator.
Did anybody see where it went?