Peskin-Schroeder - Eqn 2.45 derivation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter giant_bog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of equation 2.45 from Peskin and Schroeder's text, specifically addressing the Hamiltonian's terms involving the scalar field φ and its conjugate momentum π. The participant identifies a missing boundary term in the π(x) commutator, which is crucial for the correct application of vector calculus identities. The resolution involves recognizing that the boundary term vanishes due to the behavior of the function at infinity, allowing the integration by parts technique to be applied effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with scalar field theory and commutation relations
  • Knowledge of vector calculus identities, particularly in the context of field theory
  • Proficiency in integration by parts techniques in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hamiltonian in quantum field theory using Peskin and Schroeder's "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory"
  • Explore the implications of boundary terms in quantum mechanics and field theory
  • Learn about integration techniques in the context of functional analysis
  • Investigate the role of commutation relations in the dynamics of quantum fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory, Hamiltonian mechanics, and mathematical techniques in physics.

giant_bog
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm having problems with the equations leading up to eqn 2.45 on page 25. The hamiltonian has a (\nabla\phi)^2 + m^2 \phi^2 term in the \phi(x) commutator and in the \pi(x) commutator it's \phi(-\nabla^2 + m^2) \phi.

I'm aware of a vector calculus identity that makes (\nabla\phi)^2 = 1/2 (\nabla^2[\phi^2]) - \phi \nabla^2 \phi.

That's almost what we have here, but the \frac{1}{2}(\nabla^2[\phi^2]) term is missing in the \pi(x) commutator.

Did anybody see where it went?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the n-1 boundary term which is taken be zero.
 
You can do this kind of thing using integration by parts. E.g., in one dimension:

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)^2 dx = \left[f(x) \frac{df}{dx}\right]_{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\frac{d^2 f}{dx^2}dx

And if f(x) goes to zero at infinity then the first term on the right drops out.
 
I see it now. Thanks, folks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
714
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
591