Find work done given time, acceleration, and mass

AI Thread Summary
To find the net work done on a box with a mass of 6.0 kg accelerated at 2.2 m/s² for 5.9 seconds, the force can be calculated using F=ma, resulting in 13.2 N. The work done is expressed as W=Fd*cos(0), but the distance (d) needs to be determined first. The discussion suggests using kinematic equations to find distance, with one approach being to calculate final velocity (vf) using v=vi+at. However, there is confusion regarding the calculations, as the derived distance appears inconsistent with expected values, indicating a potential error in the application of the equations. Clarifying the relationship between speed and distance is essential for accurate work calculation.
daltomagne
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
a box with a mass of 6.0 kg is accelerated from rest by a force across a floor at a rate of
2.2 m/s^2 for 5.9 s. Find the net work done on the box

m=6.0kg
a=2.2m/s^2
t=5.9 s
a=0 degrees

i know W=Fdcos(a)
and F=ma


so,
F=6.0kg*2.2m/s^2=13.2N
W=13.2N*d*cos0=13.2N*d

I am a little unsure as how to find d though. would it be one of the kinematic equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi daltomagne! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
daltomagne said:
a box with a mass of 6.0 kg is accelerated from rest by a force across a floor at a rate of
2.2 m/s^2 for 5.9 s. Find the net work done on the box

I am a little unsure as how to find d though. would it be one of the kinematic equations?

That's right. :smile:

You can either use one of the standard constant acceleration equations to find d, or you can use another of them to find vf, and then apply the work-energy theorem ( work done = change in mechanical energy).
 
so I'm thinking v=vi+at and that gives me vi=-12.98m/s
and
xf=xi+vit+1/2at2?
but that gives me a value for x=-38.3 m?

so something isn't adding up
 
where's the contradiction? :confused:

one figure is speed, the other is distance, they should both give you the same work. :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top