Lemaitre Coordinates: Plotting Freefall & Light Paths

  • Thread starter Thread starter yuiop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates
yuiop
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
20
The attached diagram is a plot of two free falling observers (vertical black lines) in Lemaitre coordinates. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemaitre_metric

The solid black diagonal line is the central singularity. Curved blue lines are ingoing light paths and curved red lines are outgoing light rays. The diagonal dashed grey lines are lines of constant radius in Schwarzschild coordinates.

The Wiki article gives some information on the Lemaitre metric but some additional information and calculations are need to obtain the equations in a form that can be plotted on a graph.

A curious feature highlighted by the diagram is that despite the distance between the two free falling observers being constant in terms of Lemaitre spatial coordinates, the radar distance is increasing in terms of the Lemaitre time coordinate which I assume is just the proper time of a falling observer. It is also clear from the diagram that far away from the gravitational source where spacetime becomes flat, the speed of light in Lemaitre coordinates does not tend towards c, but tends towards infinite.
 

Attachments

  • Lemaitre.png
    Lemaitre.png
    56.4 KB · Views: 802
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yuiop said:
It is also clear from the diagram that far away from the gravitational source where spacetime becomes flat, the speed of light in Lemaitre coordinates does not tend towards c, but tends towards infinite.

It also follows from the metric, which gives for a null, radial trajectory

<br /> \frac{d\rho}{d\tau}=\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_g}}<br /> [/itex]<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t think it has physical significance.
 
Mentz114 said:
It also follows from the metric, which gives for a null, radial trajectory

<br /> \frac{d\rho}{d\tau}=\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_g}}<br />

I don't think it has physical significance.

Came across this old thread while poking around the internet (it's high on Google's results for "Lemaitre coordinates"), figured I'd fix the formatting for the next person to come along.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top