Lemaitre Coordinates: Plotting Freefall & Light Paths

  • Thread starter Thread starter yuiop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates
yuiop
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
20
The attached diagram is a plot of two free falling observers (vertical black lines) in Lemaitre coordinates. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemaitre_metric

The solid black diagonal line is the central singularity. Curved blue lines are ingoing light paths and curved red lines are outgoing light rays. The diagonal dashed grey lines are lines of constant radius in Schwarzschild coordinates.

The Wiki article gives some information on the Lemaitre metric but some additional information and calculations are need to obtain the equations in a form that can be plotted on a graph.

A curious feature highlighted by the diagram is that despite the distance between the two free falling observers being constant in terms of Lemaitre spatial coordinates, the radar distance is increasing in terms of the Lemaitre time coordinate which I assume is just the proper time of a falling observer. It is also clear from the diagram that far away from the gravitational source where spacetime becomes flat, the speed of light in Lemaitre coordinates does not tend towards c, but tends towards infinite.
 

Attachments

  • Lemaitre.png
    Lemaitre.png
    56.4 KB · Views: 808
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yuiop said:
It is also clear from the diagram that far away from the gravitational source where spacetime becomes flat, the speed of light in Lemaitre coordinates does not tend towards c, but tends towards infinite.

It also follows from the metric, which gives for a null, radial trajectory

<br /> \frac{d\rho}{d\tau}=\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_g}}<br /> [/itex]<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t think it has physical significance.
 
Mentz114 said:
It also follows from the metric, which gives for a null, radial trajectory

<br /> \frac{d\rho}{d\tau}=\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_g}}<br />

I don't think it has physical significance.

Came across this old thread while poking around the internet (it's high on Google's results for "Lemaitre coordinates"), figured I'd fix the formatting for the next person to come along.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top