Can you explain the phenomenon of stimulated emission in lasers?

atmdw
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am interested in learning the nature of the interaction between a photon and the atoms in a medium that has undergone population inversion that causes stimulated emission i.e. if an excited-state atom is perturbed by a photon (with an electric field of specific frequency), why does it emit an additional (amazingly) coherent photon? Specifically, what is the nature of the incident photon-excited state atom perturbation? If momentum transfer, how is momentum transferred without change to the incident photon?
Thanks
An ignorant chemist
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have read the Wikipedia entry numerous times and it is informative (as is other web-based info). Wiki author states "When light of the appropriate frequency passes through the inverted medium, the photons stimulate the excited atoms to emit additional photons of the same frequency, phase, and direction, resulting in an amplification of the input intensity". My question is how does an incident photon (some of which presumably are not absorbed) induce additional photon emission from excited state atoms. I have read that there is some type of momentum transfer but I don't understand how that occurs without a change in energy (and frequency and phase) in the incident photon. A few good articles (but surprisingly few publications) are available on coherence but the conservation of momentum argument is confusing to me. I'm presuming that Einsteins thought experiment didn't involve a photon drive by.
 
Last edited:
I suggest you try to get a modern description of the physics described in Einstein's paper. I have never gone through it, but simply accepted it as a fact of nature (lasers work!).
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top