Question regarding math schools

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the differences between math degree programs at Arizona State University (ASU) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). While both institutions cover similar material, MIT offers advantages such as stronger professor prestige, enhanced research opportunities, and a more selective student body that fosters a higher level of peer interaction and learning. The caliber of students at MIT allows for quicker comprehension of complex concepts, which can enhance the educational experience. In contrast, the differences may be less significant for undergraduate students compared to graduate students. Overall, the environment and peer dynamics at MIT are seen as superior to those at ASU.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
I was always curious, what is the difference between getting a math degree at Arizona State University or MIT?
In the long run, won't a person from MIT or ASU learn the same things in the long run? Or no?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Connections, professor prestige, research possibilities. Other than that, undergraduate programs are pretty much the same.
 
I do not entirely agree. First, "professor prestige" is not just "prestige"- they really are better professors. But not necessarily better at teaching. The difference between professors at M.I.T. and, say Arizona State University, is much more important to graduate students than to undergraduates.

But the difference in students is very important. The fact that the students are more highly selected means that more of them are able to grasp concepts more quickly and the class does not have to spend more time on the same subjects. Also the "give and take" between students in classes is very important to learning- and that will be of a much higher level at M.I.T. than at A.S.U.

(Of course, A.S.U.'s football team is better!)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
72
Views
7K
Back
Top