What Factors Affect the Height of Water Splashes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantum123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Water
AI Thread Summary
The height of water splashes when a stone hits the surface is influenced by several factors, even if the stone's velocity remains constant. The mass of the stone plays a significant role, as heavier stones can create larger splashes. Additionally, the depth to which the stone penetrates the water affects the splash height, with deeper entries potentially leading to higher splashes. The angle at which the stone strikes the water is also crucial, as it can significantly alter the splash dynamics. Overall, these physical properties collectively determine the resulting splash height.
quantum123
Messages
306
Reaction score
1
If the velocity of a stone is the same in all cases, what determines how high the water splashes when hit by the stone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quantum123 said:
If the velocity of a stone is the same in all cases, what determines how high the water splashes when hit by the stone?
You will have to explain the question more clearly.

AM
 
Well, the mass of the stone will most certainly make a difference. I imagfine here are many physical properties of the stone that would make a diff.
 
Does it depend on how deep the stone travels into the water?
 
I believe how deep the stone goes into the water would alter the splash height somewhat, but I think the angle that the stone was at while hitting the water makes a big difference in the splash.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top