Notation for Domain Variable Expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomwilliam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    domains Notation
AI Thread Summary
When expressing an equation with undefined variable values, such as x=1/((y-2)(y-3)), standard set notation is often preferred. Instead of using "or," the union symbol (U) can be used to denote the ranges where the variable is defined. A conventional representation would be y ∈ (-∞, 2) U (2, 3) U (3, ∞). Another option is to state y ∈ ℝ, y ≠ 2, y ≠ 3. Both methods are valid, but using set notation may enhance clarity.
tomwilliam
Messages
141
Reaction score
2
If you have an equation with a variable which isn't defined for a given value or values, how do you express this in proper notation? For example:
x=1/((y-2)(y-3))

Do I write simply " y<2 or 2<y<3 or 3<y" or is there a better way to express it?
Thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tomwilliam said:
If you have an equation with a variable which isn't defined for a given value or values, how do you express this in proper notation? For example:
x=1/((y-2)(y-3))

Do I write simply " y<2 or 2<y<3 or 3<y" or is there a better way to express it?
Thx
There exist no strictly better ways than the one you've chosen, but it is perhaps slightly more conventional to use standard set notation. your "or" is then replaced by the symbol for "union" (a "U"), and your (strict) inequalities are replaced by indicating the open sets the inequality indicates.
For example, we may write yours that "y" is an element of:
(-inf,2)U(2,3)U(3,inf)

Alternatively, we might write something like:
y\in\mathcal{R},y\neq{2},y\neq{3}

Again, your own expression is perfectly fine.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top