Circular Orbits in SR: Force, mv^2/r, L Conservation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter upurg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular Orbits Sr
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the equations and concepts related to circular orbits in special relativity (SR), particularly in the context of forces such as electromagnetic and gravitational forces. Participants explore the implications of SR on the classical mechanics equations for circular motion and the conservation of angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the expression for circular orbits in SR and how the classical equation F = mv²/r is modified.
  • There is a question regarding whether the force law k/r² changes in SR when considering electromagnetic forces.
  • One participant asserts that orbits, being accelerated systems, cannot be analyzed within the framework of SR, suggesting that SR is applicable only to unaccelerated systems.
  • Another participant counters this by stating that SR can analyze accelerating systems from an inertial reference frame and that non-inertial frames can also be considered within SR under certain conditions.
  • A participant provides a formula for stable circular orbits in general relativity (GR), noting that such expressions may not be necessary in SR under certain conditions.
  • Technical details are shared regarding the four-velocity and four-force in the context of circular motion in SR, including equations involving angular velocity and relativistic corrections.
  • There are discussions about potential typographical errors in the equations presented, with participants correcting each other and clarifying the meaning of variables used.
  • One participant suggests that transitioning from classical mechanics to SR involves a modification of the force expression to include a gamma factor, raising questions about the implications of this change.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of SR to circular orbits, with some asserting that orbits cannot be analyzed in SR while others argue that they can. There is no consensus on the specific equations governing circular motion in SR, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the modifications needed from classical mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of transitioning from classical mechanics to special relativity, particularly in how forces and motion are described. There are unresolved questions about the definitions and assumptions underlying the equations presented.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying the implications of special relativity on classical mechanics, particularly in the context of circular motion and forces, as well as those exploring the mathematical formulations of these concepts.

upurg
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
In CM there is this equation of motion for ciruclar orbits:
F=k/r^2=m*v^2/r, where k depends on the force involved.

I know this gets complicated in GR, but is there a simple expression for circular orbits in SR, what happends to the m*v^2/r ?

If the forces are only electromagnetic, does k/r^2 change in SR ?

Also, is the quantity L=mrv conserved in SR, or some modification ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I want to know what is the equation(s) for circular orbits in SR, in A) electromagnetic force k/r^2 and B) gravitational force if it is possible. Any reference ?
 
I could be wrong, but SR applies to unaccelerated systems. Orbits, by definition, are accelerated systems; therefore you will not find orbits in SR.

Further for SR to be of any interest you need to have a substantial fraction of c involved. Orbits at that speed would be in the world of QM. Once again, no SR orbits.
 
Integral said:
I could be wrong, but SR applies to unaccelerated systems. Orbits, by definition, are accelerated systems; therefore you will not find orbits in SR.
As it turns out that is wrong, in SR one can easily analyze the behavior of accelerating systems from the perspective of an inertial reference frame, and the modern view is that even non-inertial frames are considered part of SR if the curvature of spacetime is zero. See Can special relativity handle acceleration? from the Usenet Physics FAQ for more info.
 
If you meant GR, on the other hand, there exists such an expression. If I remember correctly, it is

r \left( \frac{d\phi}{dt} \right)^2=v=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{r-\frac{2GM}{c^2}}}

Where t is the time measured by a comoving observer.

As you can see, you don't need the general relativistic correction when r>>\frac{2GM}{c^2}.

Note also that stable circular orbits only exist when r>\frac{3GM}{c^2} because of the speed limit of v<c.
 
upurg said:
In CM there is this equation of motion for ciruclar orbits:
F=k/r^2=m*v^2/r, where k depends on the force involved.

I know this gets complicated in GR, but is there a simple expression for circular orbits in SR, what happends to the m*v^2/r ?
In units where c=1 f you start with uniform circular motion, we have an equation for the worldline (parameterized by coordinate time):
s=(t,r\;cos(t\omega),r\;sin(t\omega),0)

which gives a four-velocity:
u=\frac{ds}{d\tau}=\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-r^2\omega^2}},-\frac{r\omega\;sin(t\omega)}{\sqrt{1-r^2\omega^2}} ,\frac{r\omega\;cos(t\omega)}{\sqrt{1-r^2\omega^2}} ,0 \right)

and therefore a four-force:
f=\frac{d(mu)}{d\tau}=\left( 0, -\frac{mr\omega^2\;cos(t\omega)}{1-r^2\omega^2} , -\frac{mr\omega^2\;sin(t\omega)}{1-r^2\omega^2}, 0\right)

So the magnitude of the four-force is:
|f|=\frac{m r\omega^2}{1-r^2\omega^2}
 
Last edited:
In relativistic physics, the Born coordinate chart is a coordinate chart for (part of) Minkowski spacetime, the flat spacetime of special relativity. It is often used to analyze the physical experience of observers who ride on a rigidly rotating ring or disk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_coordinates

I think there's a typo above, and the force should be

<br /> f=\frac{d(mu)}{d\tau}=\left( 0, -\frac{mr\omega^2\.cos(t\omega)}{1-r^2\omega^2} , -\frac{mr\omega^2\.sin(t\omega)}{1-r^2\omega^2}, 0\right)<br />

Easy to do with so much Tex.:wink:
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
I think there's a typo above
Oops! :redface: thanks for the heads-up. I have fixed it.
 
DaleSpam said:
Oops! :redface: thanks for the heads-up. I have fixed it.
Doesnt look like it's corrected, two dots missing, is m rest mass of the orbiting object? And f points radially inwards ?
 
  • #10
It is correct, the dots were also mistakes. Yes, m is the invariant mass of the orbiting object, and yes, f points radially inwards.
 
  • #11
Awesome, also, if w=v/r, then this force is just gamma^2 * mv^2/r, so all we need to do when going from CM to SR is v->gamma*v ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K